Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2353040007
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rogalla, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hamm, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rogalla, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hamm, B.
(Radiology 2005;236:184-188.)
© RSNA, 2005


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Spasmolysis at CT Colonography: Butyl Scopolamine versus Glucagon1

Patrik Rogalla, MD, Alexander Lembcke, MD, Jens C. Rückert, MD, Eike Hein, MD, Matthias Bollow, MD, Noga E. Rogalla, MD, RD and Bernd Hamm, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (P.R., A.L., E.H., M.B., N.E.R., B.H.) and General, Vascular, Thoracic, and Visceral Surgery (J.C.R.), Charité Campus Mitte, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Schumannstr 20/21, 10098 Berlin, Germany. Received January 7, 2004; revision requested March 9; final revision received August 8; accepted August 25. Address correspondence to P.R. (e-mail: rogalla{at}charite.de).

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine if the use of butyl scopolamine or glucagon in the supine patient improves colonic distention and reduces the number of collapsed intestinal segments at computed tomographic (CT) colonography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study had institutional review board approval; subject informed consent was not required. CT colonography was performed without the administration of an intravenous spasmolytic in 80 asymptomatic subjects (group 1; 45 women, 35 men; age range, 48–77 years; mean, 61.9 years). These subjects were matched with two groups of 80 subjects who were similar in age but were premedicated with glucagon (group 2; 41 women, 39 men; age range, 43–76 years; mean, 63.1 years) or butyl scopolamine (group 3; 43 women, 37 men; age range, 34–77 years; mean, 63.4 years). All 240 subjects were examined in the supine position with multisection CT and a section thickness of 1 mm after intravenous contrast agent administration and rectal carbon dioxide insufflation. The colon was divided into seven segments, and the colon length, total volume, radial distensibility, and number of nondistended segments were calculated for each subject and compared among the three groups. Statistical analysis was performed with analysis of variance and {chi}2 testing.

RESULTS: Mean bowel length was not significantly different among the groups. Mean colon volumes and radial distensibilities, respectively, were 1.84 L and 3.69 cm in group 1, 2.14 L and 3.98 cm in group 2, and 2.35 L and 4.23 cm in group 3; differences in colon volume and radial distensibility were significant only between group 1 and group 3 (P < .001). At CT colonography, 29 segments in 20 group 1 subjects were collapsed, 23 segments in 12 group 2 subjects were collapsed, and 11 segments in six group 3 subjects were collapsed (P = .016).

CONCLUSION: Premedication with butyl scopolamine or, less effectively, glucagon improves colonic distention in the supine subject.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
radtechHome page
D. S. WERDERMAN
CT Colonography
Radiol. Technol., March 1, 2007; 78(4): 309CT - 324CT.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
T. Mang, A. Maier, C. Plank, C. Mueller-Mang, C. Herold, and W. Schima
Pitfalls in Multi-Detector Row CT Colonography: A Systematic Approach
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2007; 27(2): 431 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]