HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2361040456v1 236/1/214    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ondategui-Parra, S. Articles by Ros, P. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ondategui-Parra, S. Articles by Ros, P. R.

Use of Productivity and Financial Indicators for Monitoring Performance in Academic Radiology Departments: U.S. Nationwide Survey¹

¹ From the Radiology Management Group, Department of Radiology (S.O.P., J.G.B., K.H.Z., E.N., I.E.G., P.R.R.), and Department of Hospital Administration (S.O.P.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, One Brigham Circle, 1620 Tremont St, Boston, MA 02115; and Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (K.H.Z.). Received March 9, 2004; revision requested May 20; revision received October 1; accepted November 4. Address correspondence to S.O.P. e-mail: sondateguiparra{at}partners.org).

PURPOSE: To determine how productivity- and finance-related indicators are used by radiology departments to evaluate departmental performance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study met the criteria to be exempt from institutional review board approval. All subjects were informed of the purpose of the study and that their questionnaire responses would be kept confidential. For the study, a survey was sent to 132 members of the Society of Chairmen of Academic Radiology Departments (SCARD) nationwide. The survey was designed to (a) assess organizational information about hospital and radiology departments, (b) determine the types and mean numbers of productivity and financial indicators used by radiology departments, (c) determine how these indicators are used to influence departmental productivity, and (d) assess the reference-standard goals with which each indicator value was compared. A total of 77 variables were studied. Summary statistics, Spearman rank correlation coefficient, and ² analyses were performed.

RESULTS: The response rate was 42% (55 of 132 surveyed SCARD members). The mean number of productivity indicators used by radiology departments was 4.55 ± 2.56 (standard deviation), while the mean number of financial indicators used was 2.89 ± 1.99. Twenty-two (40%) of the 55 responding departments used productivity indicators to monitor and provide feedback to radiologists, hospital leaders, and technical staff members for improved productivity, but only 11 (20%) departments used these indicators to compare personnel performances against specific productivity standards. The most frequent goal (of seven [13%] responding departments) of using the indicators was to increase the examination volume from the previous year by 5%–10%.

CONCLUSION: Academic radiology departments across the United States do not use a standardized set of productivity and financial indicators to measure departmental performance. Examination volume is the most frequently used productivity indicator, whereas general expenses are commonly used as indicators of financial status.

© RSNA, 2005

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. S. Brody Computed Tomography Scanning in Cystic Fibrosis Research Trials: Practical Lessons from Three Clinical Trials in the United States Proceedings of the ATS, August 1, 2007; 4(4): 350 - 354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]