Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print June 13, 2005, 10.1148/radiol.2361040084
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2361040084v1
236/1/338    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolfram, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Minar, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wolfram, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Minar, E.
(Radiology 2005;236:338-342.)
© RSNA, 2005


Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Endovascular Brachytherapy: Restenosis in de Novo versus Recurrent Lesions of Femoropopliteal Artery—The Vienna Experience1

Roswitha M. Wolfram, MD, Alexandra C. Budinsky, MS, Boris Pokrajac, MD, Richard Potter, MD and Erich Minar, MD

1 From the Departments of Angiology (R.M.W., A.C.B., E.M.) and Radiation Therapy (B.P., R.P.), Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. Received January 27, 2004; revision requested April 6; final revision received July 18; accepted August 25. Address correspondence to R.M.W. (e-mail: rmwolfram{at}hotmail.com).

PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness of endovascular brachytherapy in the prevention of restenosis in recurrent versus de novo femoropopliteal lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ethics committee approval and patient informed consent were obtained. After they had undergone femoropopliteal angioplasty, 199 patients (mean age, 71.9 years ± 9.6; 115 men, 84 women) were treated with either percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and brachytherapy (n = 100) or PTA alone (n = 99). The patients were part of prospective randomized trials, the Vienna 2 and 3 trials, and were evaluated according to the stratification criterion of de novo or recurrent disease. Sixty-six of 134 patients with a de novo lesion and 34 of 65 patients with a recurrent lesion were randomly assigned to the PTA and brachytherapy arm; the remaining patients were treated with PTA alone. Outcomes were compared between the groups. The Student t test or one-way analysis of variance was used to compare continuous variables, and the {chi}2 test or Fisher exact test was used to assess dichotomous variables. Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated, and the log-rank test was performed to determine freedom from recurrence at 12 months in both groups. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to evaluate the multivariate predictors of recurrence at 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS: For patients with de novo lesions, the frequency of recurrence at 12 months was not significantly different between those who underwent brachytherapy and PTA and those who underwent PTA alone (24 [36%] of 66 patients vs 30 [44%] of 68 patients, P = .32). For patients with recurrent lesions, however, the 12-month recurrence rate was significantly lower in those who received brachytherapy than in those who did not (nine [26%] of 34 patients vs 22 [71%] of 31 patients, P = .004).

CONCLUSION: Endovascular brachytherapy with gamma radiation significantly reduces the restenosis rate after femoropopliteal angioplasty of recurrent but not de novo lesions.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. J. White and W. A. Gray
Endovascular Therapies for Peripheral Arterial Disease: An Evidence-Based Review
Circulation, November 6, 2007; 116(19): 2203 - 2215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. White
Intermittent Claudication
N. Engl. J. Med., March 22, 2007; 356(12): 1241 - 1250.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. A. Diehm, F. Mahler, D.-D. Do, I. Baumgartner, R. M. Wolfram, B. Pokrajac, E. Minar, R. Potter, and A. C. Budinsky
Endovascular brachytherapy.
Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 610 - 611.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.