Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2361040696
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolfram, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Minar, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wolfram, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Minar, E.
(Radiology 2005;236:343-351.)
© RSNA, 2005


Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Vascular Brachytherapy with 192Ir after Femoropopliteal Stent Implantation in High-Risk Patients: Twelve-month Follow-up Results from the Vienna-5 Trial1

Roswitha M. Wolfram, MD, Alexandra C. Budinsky, MS, Boris Pokrajac, MD, Richard Pötter, MD and Erich Minar, MD

1 From the Departments of Angiology (R.M.W., A.C.B., E.M.) and Radiotherapy and Radiobiology (B.P., R.P.), Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. Received April 18, 2004; revision requested June 25; revision received July 30; accepted August 26. Address correspondence to R.M.W. (e-mail: roswitha.wolfram{at}hotmail.com).

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of endovascular brachytherapy in the prevention of restenosis after femoropopliteal stent implantation in high-risk patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients provided written informed consent to participate in this study, which was approved by the ethics committee. A total of 88 patients (mean age, 67.7 years ± 10.1; 57 men [65%], 31 women [35%]) with femoropopliteal lesions (mean treatment length, 16.8 cm ± 7.3) were included. Patients underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stent implantation and were randomized in a double-blind fashion to undergo either gamma brachytherapy with an iridium 192 source or treatment with nonradioactive seeds. A 14-Gy dose of iridium 192 was prescribed at 2 mm into the arterial wall (target depth equals vessel radius plus 2 mm). The primary end point of the study was angiographic binary restenosis of more than 50% at 6-month follow-up. Secondary end point was either percutaneous or surgical target lesion revascularization after 6 months. Continuous data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Categorical data are expressed as percentages. Student t test was used to compare continuous data; {chi}2 test was used to compare categorical values. Survival function was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to enable evaluation of multivariate predictors of recurrence at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Variables included brachytherapy, clinical stage, lesion length, de novo and recurrent lesion, vessel run off, prior stenosis or occlusion, diabetes mellitus, and stent model.

RESULTS: Revascularization and brachytherapy were accomplished successfully in all patients. The overall 6-month recurrence rate was 35% in patients who underwent only stent implantation and 33% in patients who underwent both stent implantation and brachytherapy (P = .89). Nine (10%) patients developed early reocclusion in the segment treated with a stent (two patients [4%] in the stent group and seven [17%] in the stent and brachytherapy group); of these patients, three in the stent and brachytherapy group experienced reocclusion within 24 hours of the intervention. Late (>30 days after intervention) thrombotic occlusion was observed in three patients (7%) in the stent and brachytherapy group.

CONCLUSION: Brachytherapy does not improve 6-month patency after femoropopliteal stent implantation in high-risk patients because of a high incidence of early and late thrombotic occlusion.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. J. White and W. A. Gray
Endovascular Therapies for Peripheral Arterial Disease: An Evidence-Based Review
Circulation, November 6, 2007; 116(19): 2203 - 2215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
C. Klonaris, A. Katsargyris, A. Giannopoulos, and E. Bastounis
Advances in Endovascular Treatment of Femoropopliteal Arterial Occlusive Disease
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, December 1, 2006; 18(4): 329 - 341.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.