Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print June 21, 2005, 10.1148/radiol.2362040912
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2362040912v1
236/2/485    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paul, J.-F.
Right arrow Articles by Dambrin, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paul, J.-F.
Right arrow Articles by Dambrin, G.
(Radiology 2005;236:485-489.)
© RSNA, 2005


Cardiac Imaging

Late Defect on Delayed Contrast-enhanced Multi–Detector Row CT Scans in the Prediction of SPECT Infarct Size after Reperfused Acute Myocardial Infarction: Initial Experience1

Jean-François Paul, MD, Myriam Wartski, MD, Christophe Caussin, MD, Anne Sigal-Cinqualbre, MD, Bernard Lancelin, MD, Claude Angel, MD and Grégoire Dambrin, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (J.F.P., A.S.C., C.A.), Nuclear Medicine (M.W.), and Cardiology (C.C., B.L., G.D.), Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, 133 Avenue de la Résistance, 92350 Le Plessis-Robinson, France. Received January 26, 2004; revision requested April 6; revision received August 6; accepted September 8, 2004. Address correspondence to J.F.P. (e-mail: pauljf{at}ccml.com).

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess the accuracy of multi–detector row computed tomography (CT) in the prediction of infarct size after successful reperfusion of acute myocardial infarction (MI) by using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images obtained 6 weeks later as the reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. A total of 34 patients (29 men and five women; mean age, 56 years ± 13) underwent dual-phase 16-detector row CT within 3 days ± 3 after successful reperfusion of acute MI. Iodinated contrast medium (1.5 mL per kilogram of body weight) was injected at a flow rate of 3.5 mL/sec. A first arterial phase acquisition was followed 5 minutes later by a late acquisition, without reinjection of contrast medium. A radiologist and a cardiologist used a 17-segment model in a blind analysis of images obtained during late acquisition. For each segment, presence of late defect or late enhancement was recorded. Findings were compared with SPECT studies analyzed by a nuclear medicine physician and a cardiologist 6 weeks after the acute event. CT defects were compared with SPECT defects on a segmental and per-patient basis. Mean number of segments with late defects on multi–detector row CT scans was compared with infarct size on SPECT images by using the t test.

RESULTS: All patients had late enhancement in the infarcted myocardium. In 27 of 34 patients, a late defect surrounded by a subepicardial late enhancement was detected. Segments with late defect on CT scans were predictive of residual perfusion defects at 6-week follow-up, with sensitivity of 78%, specificity of 91%, and accuracy of 90%. On a per-patient basis, sensitivity was 93%, specificity was 100%, and accuracy was 94%. Mean number of segments with late defects on multi–detector row CT scans (ie, 3.1 segments) was not significantly different from infarct size on SPECT images (eg, 2.5 segments) (P = .2).

CONCLUSION: Late defect on multi–detector row CT scans indicates residual perfusion SPECT defect and infarct size after successfully reperfused MI, with sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 94%.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Boussel, M. Ribagnac, E. Bonnefoy, P. Staat, B. M. Elicker, D. Revel, and P. Douek
Assessment of Acute Myocardial Infarction Using MDCT After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Comparison with MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 441 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Lessick, R. Dragu, D. Mutlak, S. Rispler, R. Beyar, D. Litmanovich, A. Engel, Y. Agmon, M. Kapeliovich, H. Hammerman, et al.
Is Functional Improvement after Myocardial Infarction Predicted with Myocardial Enhancement Patterns at Multidetector CT?
Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 736 - 744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Habis, A. Capderou, S. Ghostine, B. Daoud, C. Caussin, J.-Y. Riou, P. Brenot, C. Y. Angel, B. Lancelin, and J.-F. Paul
Acute Myocardial Infarction Early Viability Assessment by 64-Slice Computed Tomography Immediately After Coronary Angiography: Comparison With Low-Dose Dobutamine Echocardiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 20, 2007; 49(11): 1178 - 1185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. T. Abada, C. Larchez, B. Daoud, A. Sigal-Cinqualbre, and J.-F. Paul
MDCT of the Coronary Arteries: Feasibility of Low-Dose CT with ECG-Pulsed Tube Current Modulation to Reduce Radiation Dose
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6_Supplement_2): S387 - S390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. B. Selvanayagam
Imaging quantification of infarct size.
Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 613 - 613.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. F. Bruzzi, M. Remy-Jardin, D. Delhaye, A. Teisseire, C. Khalil, and J. Remy
When, Why, and How to Examine the Heart During Thoracic CT: Part 1, Basic Principles
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 324 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. F. Bruzzi, M. Remy-Jardin, D. Delhaye, A. Teisseire, C. Khalil, and J. Remy
When, Why, and How to Examine the Heart During Thoracic CT: Part 2, Clinical Applications
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 333 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A de Roos, L J M Kroft, J J Bax, H J Lamb, and J Geleijns
Cardiac applications of multislice computed tomography
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2006; 79(937): 9 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.