HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2362040739v1 236/2/545    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pucar, D. Articles by Zakian, K. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pucar, D. Articles by Zakian, K. L.

Prostate Cancer: Correlation of MR Imaging and MR Spectroscopy with Pathologic Findings after Radiation Therapy–Initial Experience¹

¹ From the Departments of Radiology (D.P., A.S.D., H.H., L.E., J.A.K., K.L.Z.), Medical Physics (D.P., A.S.D., L.E., J.A.K., K.L.Z.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (C.M.), Urology (K.K., P.T.S.), Pathology (K.K., S.O.), and Medicine (J.A.K.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021. Supported by National Institutes of Health grant R01 CA76423. Received April 23, 2004; revision requested June 3; revision received December 14; accepted December 20. Address correspondence to A.S.D. (e-mail: davea{at}mskcc.org).

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR spectroscopy for depiction of local prostate cancer recurrence after external-beam radiation therapy, with step-section pathologic findings as the standard of reference.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study received institutional approval, and written informed consent was obtained. Study was compliant with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Sextant biopsy, digital rectal examination, MR imaging, MR spectroscopy, and salvage radical prostatectomy with step-section pathologic examination were performed in nine patients with increasing prostate-specific antigen levels after external-beam radiation therapy. MR imaging criterion for tumor was a focal nodular region of reduced signal intensity at T2-weighted imaging. MR spectroscopic criteria for tumor were voxels with choline (Cho) plus creatine (Cr) to citrate (Cit) ratio ([Cho + Cr]/Cit) of at least 0.5 or voxels with detectable Cho and no Cit in the peripheral zone. Sensitivity and specificity of sextant biopsy, digital rectal examination, MR imaging, and MR spectroscopy were determined by using a prostate sextant as the unit of analysis. For feature analysis, MR imaging and MR spectroscopic findings were correlated with step-section pathologic findings.

RESULTS: MR imaging and MR spectroscopy showed estimated sensitivities of 68% and 77%, respectively, while sensitivities of biopsy and digital rectal examination were 48% and 16%, respectively. MR spectroscopy appears to be less specific (78%) than the other three tests, each of which had a specificity higher than 90%. MR spectroscopic feature analysis showed that a metabolically altered benign gland could be falsely identified as tumor by using MR spectroscopic criteria; further analysis of MR spectroscopic features did not lead to improved MR spectroscopic criteria for recurrent tumor.

CONCLUSION: In summary, MR imaging and MR spectroscopy may be more sensitive than sextant biopsy and digital rectal examination for sextant localization of cancer recurrence after external-beam radiation therapy.

© RSNA, 2005

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Casciani, E. Polettini, E. Carmenini, I. Floriani, G. Masselli, L. Bertini, and G. F. Gualdi Endorectal and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Detection of Local Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1187 - 1192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. B. Jani, S. L. Liauw, and M. J. Blend The Role of Indium-111 Radioimmunoscintigraphy in Post-Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy Management of Prostate Cancer Patients Clin. Med. Res., June 1, 2007; 5(2): 123 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Hricak, P. L. Choyke, S. C. Eberhardt, S. A. Leibel, and P. T. Scardino Imaging Prostate Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Perspective Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 28 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Rouviere, E. Sala, and H. Hricak MR Assessment of Recurrent Prostate Cancer after Radiation Therapy Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 635 - 637. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. J. Choi, J. K. Kim, N. Kim, K. W. Kim, E. K. Choi, and K.-S. Cho Functional MR Imaging of Prostate Cancer RadioGraphics, January 1, 2007; 27(1): 63 - 75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Futterer, S. W. T. P. J. Heijmink, T. W. J. Scheenen, J. Veltman, H. J. Huisman, P. Vos, C. A. H.-V. de Kaa, J. A. Witjes, P. F. M. Krabbe, A. Heerschap, et al. Prostate Cancer Localization with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging and Proton MR Spectroscopic Imaging Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 449 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]