Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print July 14, 2005, 10.1148/radiol.2363041371
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2363041371v1
236/3/1029    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sommer, G.
Right arrow Articles by Schraedley-Desmond, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sommer, G.
Right arrow Articles by Schraedley-Desmond, P.
(Radiology 2005;236:1029-1033.)
© RSNA, 2005


Technical Developments

Measurement of Renal Extraction Fraction with Contrast-enhanced CT1

Graham Sommer, MD, Eric W. Olcott, MD, Lawrence C. Chow, MD, Ramin R. Saket, MD and Pamela Schraedley-Desmond, PhD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Rm H1307, Stanford, CA 94305 (G.S., E.W.O., L.C., P.S.); Palo Alto Veterans Administration Medical Center, Palo Alto, Calif (E.W.O.); and Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego (R.R.S.). Received August 6, 2004; revision requested October 14; revision received November 8; accepted December 15. Address correspondence to G.S. (e-mail: gsommer{at}stanford.edu).

Study was approved by the institutional review board, and informed patient consent was waived. A method for minimization of sources of variability in measuring single-kidney extraction fraction (EF) was determined retrospectively with contrast material–enhanced computed tomography (CT). Ten adults underwent CT of the kidneys; precontrast scans were obtained, followed by postcontrast scanning 2 minutes after contrast material injection. Single-kidney EF was then calculated for each patient with the formula EF = (CTA CTV)/(CTA – CTPRE), where CTA and CTV are the postcontrast CT values (in Hounsfield units) of the systemic blood and renal venous blood, respectively, and CTPRE is the precontrast CT value of the blood. Both conventional two-dimensional and volumetric three-dimensional regions of interest were used for determining mean CT values of the blood. By using the volumetric regions of interest, left and right renal EF values averaged 17.3% and 18.0%, respectively, for two observers, compared with the accepted value of 15%–20%. This latter technique also minimized right-left kidney and interobserver variability in the measurement of EF.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. G. Sommer
Can Single-Kidney Glomerular Filtration Rate Be Determined with Contrast-enhanced CT?
Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 325 - 326.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.