HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2363041392v1 236/3/1076    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fleischmann, D. Articles by Rubin, G. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fleischmann, D. Articles by Rubin, G. D.

Quantification of Intravenously Administered Contrast Medium Transit through the Peripheral Arteries: Implications for CT Angiography¹

¹ From the Department of Angiography and Interventional Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (D.F.); and Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Room S-072, Stanford, CA 94305-5105 (D.F., G.D.R.). Received August 10, 2004; revision requested October 14; revision received November 26; accepted December 23. Address correspondence to D.F. (e-mail: d.fleischmann{at}stanford.edu)

PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the range of aortopopliteal bolus transit times in patients with moderate-to-severe peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) as a guideline for developing injection strategies for computed tomographic (CT) angiography of peripheral arteries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study protocol was approved by the local ethics board, and informed consent was obtained. Twenty patients with PAOD referred for CT angiography of the lower extremities were categorized into two groups, Fontaine stage IIb (group 1) and stage III or IV (group 2), and demographic information was collected. In all patients, a 16-mL test bolus was injected intravenously, and single-level dynamic acquisitions were obtained at the level of the abdominal aorta. After injection of a second 16-mL test bolus, dynamic acquisitions were obtained at the level of the knee (popliteal arteries). Aortopopliteal bolus transit times were calculated by subtracting the time to peak enhancement in the popliteal arteries from that in the aorta. Aortopopliteal transit speeds also were derived. Transit times and speeds were compared graphically between clinical stage groups. The time required for the contrast medium to enhance the entire peripheral arterial tree in patients with PAOD was estimated by using linear extrapolation.

RESULTS: Sixteen men and four women with a mean age of 69 years (range, 49–86 years) were included. Twelve patients were included in group 1, and eight patients, in group 2. Aortopopliteal bolus transit times ranged from 4 to 24 seconds (median, 8 seconds) in all subjects, which corresponded to bolus transit speeds of 177 and 29 mm/sec, respectively. Wide overlap of transit times and transit speeds was observed between clinical stage groups. The estimated time needed for the bolus to enhance the entire peripheral arterial tree was 6–39 seconds.

CONCLUSION: Aortopopliteal bolus transit times differ widely among patients and may be substantially delayed in all patients with PAOD. Empirical injection protocols should include an injection duration of 35 seconds or more, as well as an increased scanning delay, with table speeds of more than 30 mm/sec.

© RSNA, 2005

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. H. Lin, C. Bechara, P. Kougias, T. T. Huynh, S. A. LeMaire, and J. S. Coselli Assessment of Aortic Pathology and Peripheral Arterial Disease Using Multidetector Computed Tomographic Angiography Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, December 1, 2009; 42(6): 583 - 598. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Lin, Z.-Q. Zhang, J.-Y. Sun, Z.-M. Fan, and B. Lu Low Injection Rate for 3D Moving-Table Bolus-Chase MR Angiography: Initial Experience with 3-T Imaging to Allay Venous Contamination in the Calf Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2008; 191(6): 1734 - 1739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Schernthaner, D. Fleischmann, F. Lomoschitz, A. Stadler, J. Lammer, and C. Loewe Effect of MDCT Angiographic Findings on the Management of Intermittent Claudication Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1215 - 1222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Albrecht, E. Foert, R. Holtkamp, M. A. Kirchin, C. Ribbe, F. K. Wacker, M. Kruschewski, and B. C. Meyer 16-MDCT Angiography of Aortoiliac and Lower Extremity Arteries: Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2007; 189(3): 702 - 711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]