Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2363040039
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shemesh, J.
Right arrow Articles by Motro, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shemesh, J.
Right arrow Articles by Motro, M.
(Radiology 2005;236:810-814.)
© RSNA, 2005


Cardiac Imaging

Coronary Artery Calcium Measurement with Multi–Detector Row CT and Low Radiation Dose: Comparison between 55 and 165 mAs1

Joseph Shemesh, MD, Rami Evron, PhD, Nira Koren-Morag, PhD, Sara Apter, MD, Judith Rozenman, MD, Dorith Shaham, MD, Yacov Itzchak, MD and Michael Motro, MD

1 From the Grace Ballas Research Unit of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Institute, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine (J.S., M.M.) and Division of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine (N.K.), Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Hashomer 52621, Israel; CT Engineering, Philips Medical Systems, Haifa, Israel (R.E.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel (S.A., J.R., Y.I.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (D.S.). From the 2003 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received January 8, 2004; revision requested March 9; final revision received November 16; accepted December 10. Supported by a grant from Philips Medical Systems. Address correspondence to J.S. (e-mail: dshemesh{at}netvision.net.il).

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the results of coronary artery calcium (CAC) measurements obtained with 55- and 165-mAs electrocardiographically gated multi–detector row computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional clinical study review board approval and written informed consent were obtained. Fifty-one consecutive subjects (mean age, 59 years ± 10) were scanned consecutively by using 165 and 55 mAs. For each examination, the number of lesions, total calcium score (TCS) calculated with Agatston algorithm (130-HU threshold), and calcium mass (in milligrams) were measured. Noise was measured by averaging 1 standard deviation of the CT attenuation values in five consecutive transverse sections of the ascending aorta. Paired t test and Pearson correlation were used to compare measurements between the examinations.

RESULTS: By using 55 mAs, CAC was detected (TCS > 0) in all 33 subjects in whom CAC was initially detected with 165 mAs. The mean values of CAC measures with 165 and 55 mAs, respectively, were as follows: number of lesions, 6.2 ± 9.6 and 6.1 ± 9.4; TCS, 123 ± 223 and 126 ± 225; and calcium mass, 23.25 mg ± 43 and 24.25 mg ± 44 (P value was not significant for all parameters). Significant high correlation was found between the two methods for all measures (r > 0.90, P < .01). Similar results were obtained with analysis by coronary vessel. Image noise was 9.3 HU ± 2.1 with 165 mAs and 14.7 HU ± 3.9 with 55 mAs (P < .001), with a parallel decrease in the volume CT dose index from 12 to 4 mGy.

CONCLUSION: Radiation dose can be reduced (eg, 55 mAs) for CAC detection and measurement at multi–detector row CT and provides results comparable to those obtained with 165 mAs.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. M. Kim, M. J. Chung, K. S. Lee, Y. H. Choe, C. A. Yi, and B.-K. Choe
Coronary Calcium Screening Using Low-Dose Lung Cancer Screening: Effectiveness of MDCT with Retrospective Reconstruction
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 917 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. H. McCollough, S. Ulzheimer, S. S. Halliburton, K. Shanneik, R. D. White, and W. A. Kalender
Coronary Artery Calcium: A Multi-institutional, Multimanufacturer International Standard for Quantification at Cardiac CT
Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 527 - 538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.