HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2363041162v1 236/3/886    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Terra, M. P. Articles by Stoker, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Terra, M. P. Articles by Stoker, J.

Anal Sphincter Defects in Patients with Fecal Incontinence: Endoanal versus External Phased-Array MR Imaging¹

¹ From the Departments of Radiology (M.P.T., A.C.D., J.S.) and Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (M.G.W.D., P.M.M.B.), Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Departments of Radiology (R.G.H.B.) and Surgery (C.G.M.I.B.), University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands; and Department of Radiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (V.P.M.v.d.H.). From the 2003 RSNA Annual Meeting. Supported by grant 945-01-013 of the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development. Received July 2, 2004; revision requested September 2; revision received October 6; accepted November 5. Address correspondence to M.P.T. (e-mail: m.p.terra{at}amc.uva.nl).

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare external phased-array magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with endoanal MR imaging in depicting external and internal anal sphincter defects in patients with fecal incontinence and to prospectively evaluate observer reproducibility in the detection of external and internal anal sphincter defects with both MR imaging techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical ethics committees of both participating hospitals approved the study, and informed consent was obtained. Thirty patients (23 women, seven men; mean age, 58.7 years; range, 37–78 years) with fecal incontinence underwent MR imaging with both endoanal and external phased-array coils. MR images were evaluated by three radiologists with different levels of experience for external and internal anal sphincter defects. Measures of inter- and intraobserver agreement of both MR imaging techniques and of differences between both imaging techniques were calculated.

RESULTS: Both MR imaging techniques did not significantly differ in the depiction of external (P > .99) and internal (P > .99) anal sphincter defects. The techniques corresponded in 25 (83%) of 30 patients for the depiction of external anal sphincter defects and in 28 (93%) of 30 patients for the depiction of internal anal sphincter defects. Interobserver agreement was moderate to good for endoanal MR imaging and poor to fair for external phased-array MR imaging. Intraobserver agreement ranged from fair to very good for both imaging techniques.

CONCLUSION: External phased-array MR imaging is comparable to endoanal MR imaging in the depiction of clinically relevant anal sphincter defects. Because of the weak interobserver agreement, both MR imaging techniques can be recommended in the diagnostic work-up of fecal incontinence only if sufficient experience is available.

© RSNA, 2005

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. E. Lockhart, J. R. Fielding, H. E. Richter, L. Brubaker, C. G. Salomon, W. Ye, C. M. Hakim, C. Y. Wai, A. H. Stolpen, and A. M. Weber Reproducibility of Dynamic MR Imaging Pelvic Measurements: A Multi-institutional Study Radiology, November 1, 2008; 249(2): 534 - 540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. F. El Sayed, S. El Mashed, A. Farag, M. M. Morsy, and M. S. Abdel Azim Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Assessment with Combined Analysis of Static and Dynamic MR Imaging Findings Radiology, August 1, 2008; 248(2): 518 - 530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. C. Dobben, R. J. F. Felt-Bersma, F. J. W. ten Kate, and J. Stoker Cross-Sectional Imaging of the Anal Sphincter in Fecal Incontinence Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): 671 - 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Berton, G. Gola, and S. R. Wilson Sonography of Benign Conditions of the Anal Canal: An Update Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2007; 189(4): 765 - 773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. C. Dobben, M. P. Terra, M. Deutekom, J. F. M. Slors, L. W. M. Janssen, P. M. M. Bossuyt, and J. Stoker The Role of Endoluminal Imaging in Clinical Outcome of Overlapping Anterior Anal Sphincter Repair in Patients with Fecal Incontinence Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): W70 - W77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. P. Terra, R. G. H. Beets-Tan, V. P. M. van der Hulst, M. Deutekom, M. G. W. Dijkgraaf, P. M. M. Bossuyt, A. C. Dobben, C. G. M. I. Baeten, and J. Stoker MRI in Evaluating Atrophy of the External Anal Sphincter in Patients with Fecal Incontinence Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): 991 - 999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]