HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2371041065v1 237/1/242    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mengiardi, B. Articles by Pfirrmann, C. W. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mengiardi, B. Articles by Pfirrmann, C. W. A.

Spring Ligament Complex: MR Imaging–Anatomic Correlation and Findings in Asymptomatic Subjects¹

¹ From the Departments of Radiology (B.M., M.Z., J.H., C.W.A.P.) and Orthopedic Surgery (P.B.S., P.V.), Orthopedic University Hospital Balgrist, Forchstrasse 340, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland; and Department of Pathology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland (B.B.). Received June 16, 2004; revision requested August 25; revision received October 16; accepted November 15. Address correspondence to B.M. (e-mail: mengiardi{at}yahoo.de).

PURPOSE: To use magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to assess the anatomy of the spring ligament complex (SLC) in cadaveric feet and to prospectively evaluate the MR imaging depiction of this complex in asymptomatic subjects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cadaveric feet were obtained and used according to institutional guidelines and with institutional approval and consent from the donors (before death) or the appropriate family members. Healthy volunteers were examined, with institutional review board approval and informed consent from each volunteer. MR imaging findings of the SLC in five cadaveric feet were analyzed and correlated with the findings in dissected foot specimens. Then, the MR imaging findings in the feet of 78 asymptomatic subjects were analyzed. For all three parts of the SLC, visibility, optimal imaging plane, and signal intensity characteristics were analyzed. The thicknesses of all SLC parts were measured. The measurements obtained in men and women were compared by using the Mann-Whitney U test, and Pearson correlation coefficients for associations between ligament thickness and subject age and sex were calculated.

RESULTS: In the cadaveric feet, MR imaging enabled differentiation of all three parts of the SLC. The superomedial calcaneonavicular ligament (CNL) was visible in all; the medioplantar oblique CNL, in 60; and the inferoplantar longitudinal CNL, in 71 volunteers. The superomedial CNL had a mean thickness of 3.2 mm, was best seen on transverse oblique or coronal MR images, and had mainly intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted images and low signal intensity on T2-weighted images. The medioplantar oblique CNL had a mean thickness of 2.8 mm, was best seen on transverse oblique MR images, and had mainly a typical striated appearance on T1- and T2-weighted images. The inferoplantar longitudinal CNL was the thickest (mean thickness, 4.0 mm), was best seen on coronal MR images, and had mainly intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted images and variable signal intensity on T2-weighted images. Women had significantly thinner superomedial (mean thickness, 3.3 vs 3.5 mm; P = .015, Mann-Whitney U test) and inferoplantar longitudinal (mean thickness, 3.8 vs 4.2 mm; P = .02) CNLs than men. There was no significant correlation between ligament thickness and subject age.

CONCLUSION: The superomedial and inferoplantar longitudinal CNLs are consistently visible portions of the SLC. The medioplantar oblique ligament is thinner, is seen less consistently, and has mainly a characteristic striated MR imaging appearance.

© RSNA, 2005

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Harish, D. Kumbhare, J. O'Neill, and T. Popowich Comparison of Sonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Spring Ligament Abnormalities: Preliminary Study J. Ultrasound Med., August 1, 2008; 27(8): 1145 - 1152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Mengiardi, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, P. Vienne, J. Hodler, and M. Zanetti Medial Collateral Ligament Complex of the Ankle: MR Appearance in Asymptomatic Subjects Radiology, March 1, 2007; 242(3): 817 - 824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]