HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2371040758v1 237/1/274    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brem, R. F. Articles by Welch, B. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Brem, R. F. Articles by Welch, B. L.

Occult Breast Cancer: Scintimammography with High-Resolution Breast-specific Gamma Camera in Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer¹

¹ From Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging and Intervention Center, (R.F.B., J.A.R., G.Z., K.M., J.R.) and Department of Surgery, Breast Care Center (C.B.T.), George Washington University Medical Center, 2150 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20037; and the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, Va (S.M., B.L.W.). Received May 4, 2004; revision requested July 14; revision received October 1; accepted November 15. Supported by a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb, Billerica, Mass. Address correspondence to R.F.B. (e-mail: rbrem{at}mfa.gwu.edu).

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate a high-resolution breast-specific gamma camera for depicting occult breast cancer in women at high risk for breast cancer but with normal mammographic and physical examination findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent were obtained. The study was HIPAA compliant. Ninety-four high-risk women (age range, 36–78 years; mean, 55 years) with normal mammographic (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System [BI-RADS] 1 or 2) and physical examination findings were evaluated with scintimammography. After injection with 25–30 mCi (925–1110 MBq) of technetium 99m sestamibi, patients were imaged with a high-resolution small-field-of-view breast-specific gamma camera in craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique projections. Scintimammograms were prospectively classified according to focal radiotracer uptake as normal (score of 1), with no focal or diffuse uptake; benign (score of 2), with minimal patchy uptake; probably benign (score of 3), with scattered patchy uptake; probably abnormal (score of 4), with mild focal radiotracer uptake; and abnormal (score of 5), with marked focal radiotracer uptake. Mammographic breast density was categorized according to BI-RADS criteria. Patients with normal scintimammograms (scores of 1, 2, or 3) were followed up for 1 year with an annual mammogram, physical examination, and repeat scintimammography. Patients with abnormal scintimammograms (scores of 4 or 5) underwent ultrasonography (US), and those with focal hypoechoic lesions underwent biopsy. If no lesion was found during US, patients were followed up with scintimammography. Specific pathologic findings were compared with scintimammographic findings.

RESULTS: Of 94 women, 78 (83%) had normal scintimammograms (score of 1, 2, or 3) at initial examination and 16 (17%) had abnormal scintimammograms (score of 4 or 5). Fourteen (88%) of the 16 patients had either benign findings at biopsy or no focal abnormality at US; in two (12%) patients, invasive carcinoma was diagnosed at US-guided biopsy (9 mm each at pathologic examination).

CONCLUSION: High-resolution breast-specific scintimammography can depict small (<1-cm), mammographically occult, nonpalpable lesions in women at increased risk for breast cancer not otherwise identified at mammography or physical examination.

© RSNA, 2005

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. F. Brem, A. C. Floerke, J. A. Rapelyea, C. Teal, T. Kelly, and V. Mathur Breast-specific Gamma Imaging as an Adjunct Imaging Modality for the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 651 - 657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]