HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kalra, M. K. Articles by Aquino, S. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kalra, M. K. Articles by Aquino, S. L.

Chest CT Performed with Z-Axis Modulation: Scanning Protocol and Radiation Dose¹

¹ From the Division of Thoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, White 270-E, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114 (M.K.K., S.R., M.M.M., E.F.H., J.O.S., S.L.A.); and GE Medical Systems, Waukesha, Wis (T.L.T.). Received August 11, 2004; revision requested October 14; revision received December 1; accepted January 14. Supported in part by a grant from GE Medical Systems, Waukesha, Wis. Address correspondence to M.K.K. (e-mail: mannudeep_k_kalra{at}yahoo.com).

Institutional review board approval of the study protocol and waiver of informed consent were obtained. This study was compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess the scanning protocol and radiation dose associated with z-axis automatic tube current modulation in multi–detector row CT scanning of the chest. Fifty-three patients (mean age, 54 years; age range, 26–77 years; 25 men, 28 women) underwent 16–detector row chest CT with z-axis modulation and noise indexes of 10.0, 12.5, and 15.0 HU. Two radiologists independently compared images acquired with z-axis modulation and fixed tube current (180–300 mA) techniques for image noise, diagnostic acceptability, and depiction of peripheral bronchovascular markings. Tube current–time product was calculated for each study. There was good interobserver agreement between the two readers ( = 0.72). Compared with the fixed tube current technique, z-axis modulation provides acceptable image noise for chest CT, with an 18% and 26% reduction in tube current–time product at 10.0- and 12.5-HU noise indexes, respectively.

© RSNA, 2005

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. B. Smith, W. P. Dillon, B. C. Lau, R. Gould, F. R. Verdun, E. B. Lopez, and M. Wintermark Radiation Dose Reduction Strategy for CT Protocols: Successful Implementation in Neuroradiology Section Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 499 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U.K. Udayasankar, K. Braithwaite, M. Arvaniti, D. Tudorascu, W.C. Small, S. Little, and S. Palasis Low-Dose Nonenhanced Head CT Protocol for Follow-Up Evaluation of Children with Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt: Reduction of Radiation and Effect on Image Quality AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2008; 29(4): 802 - 806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.T. Russell, J.R. Fink, F. Rebeles, K. Kanal, M. Ramos, and Y. Anzai Balancing Radiation Dose and Image Quality: Clinical Applications of Neck Volume CT AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2008; 29(4): 727 - 731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Kubo, P.-J. P. Lin, W. Stiller, M. Takahashi, H.-U. Kauczor, Y. Ohno, and H. Hatabu Radiation Dose Reduction in Chest CT: A Review Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 335 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Matsubara, K. Koshida, M. Suzuki, H. Tsujii, T. Yamamoto, and O. Matsui Comparison between 3-D and z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique in multidetector-row CT Radiat Prot Dosimetry, January 1, 2008; 128(1): 106 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Coursey, D. P. Frush, T. Yoshizumi, G. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, and S. B. Greenberg Pediatric Chest MDCT Using Tube Current Modulation: Effect on Radiation Dose with Breast Shielding Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): W54 - W61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A.B. Smith, W.P. Dillon, R. Gould, and M. Wintermark Radiation Dose-Reduction Strategies for Neuroradiology CT Protocols AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2007; 28(9): 1628 - 1632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Deetjen, S. Mollmann, G. Conradi, A. Rolf, A. Schmermund, C. W Hamm, and T. Dill Use of automatic exposure control in multislice computed tomography of the coronaries: comparison of 16-slice and 64-slice scanner data with conventional coronary angiography Heart, September 1, 2007; 93(9): 1040 - 1043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Hur, S. W. Hong, S. Y. Kim, Y. H. Kim, Y. J. Hwang, W. R. Lee, and S. J. Cha Uniform Image Quality Achieved by Tube Current Modulation Using SD of Attenuation in Coronary CT Angiography Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): 188 - 196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Namasivayam, M.K. Kalra, K.M. Pottala, S.M. Waldrop, and P.A. Hudgins Optimization of Z-Axis Automatic Exposure Control for Multidetector Row CT Evaluation of Neck and Comparison with Fixed Tube Current Technique for Image Quality and Radiation Dose AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2006; 27(10): 2221 - 2225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]