Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2371041520
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Wittram, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jones, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Wittram, C.
(Radiology 2005;237:329-337.)
© RSNA, 2005


Thoracic Imaging

The Indeterminate CT Pulmonary Angiogram: Imaging Characteristics and Patient Clinical Outcome1

Stephen E. Jones, MD, PhD and Conrad Wittram, MB, ChB

1 From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2698. Received September 8, 2004; revision requested November 12; revision received November 26; accepted December 30. Address correspondence to S.E.J. (e-mail: sejones{at}partners.org).

PURPOSE: To retrospectively review imaging characteristics of indeterminate computed tomographic (CT) pulmonary angiograms for pulmonary embolism (PE) and patient outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Investigational review board approval was obtained, informed consent was waived, and the study was HIPAA compliant. Retrospective review of 3612 CT pulmonary angiography reports created between July 1, 2001, and July 1, 2003, was performed with a keyword search for "indeterminate," "nondiagnostic," or "inadequate" (thereafter, all defined as "indeterminate") and yielded studies from 237 patients (mean age, 57 years; 117 men, 120 women). Randomly selected diagnostic studies were used to form a control group of 25 subjects (mean age, 64 years; eight men, 17 women). Electronic medical records were reviewed for follow-up imaging (repeat CT pulmonary angiography, conventional pulmonary angiography, ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy, or lower-extremity ultrasonography [US]), use of anticoagulation, placement of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters, clinical outcomes, and comments regarding indeterminate reading of CT angiograms. Studies (in patients and control subjects) were reviewed for PE, contrast attenuation in the main pulmonary artery (MPA), motion artifacts, image noise, and flow artifacts. Findings were compared with two-sample t tests assuming unequal variance.

RESULTS: The cause cited for indeterminism was most often motion (74%), followed by poor contrast enhancement (40%). Contrast attenuation in the MPA was 245 HU ± 80 (standard deviation) in patients and 339 HU ± 88 in control subjects (P < .001). Only 46% of indeterminate studies met institutional criteria for adequate contrast attenuation in the MPA. Rereview of studies demonstrated five missed PEs. A total of 81 patients (33%) underwent follow-up imaging within 5 days, with one positive pulmonary angiogram and four positive lower-limb US scans. Reread or follow-up images depicted thromboembolic disease in 4.2% of patients. Nineteen patients (8%) with indeterminate final result were treated for thromboembolic disease with either anticoagulation or IVC filters. Reports on 22% of indeterminate studies contained recommendations for follow-up imaging, and those recommendations nonsignificantly increased the rate for those examinations from 13% to 19%. Review of discharge summaries showed 22% of studies are clinically interpreted as negative.

CONCLUSION: The two major causes of indeterminism are motion artifacts and poor contrast enhancement.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
H. D. Sostman, M. Miniati, A. Gottschalk, F. Matta, P. D. Stein, and M. Pistolesi
Sensitivity and Specificity of Perfusion Scintigraphy Combined with Chest Radiography for Acute Pulmonary Embolism in PIOPED II
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2008; 49(11): 1741 - 1748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Roggenland, S. A. Peters, S. P. Lemburg, T. Holland-Letz, V. Nicolas, and C. M. Heyer
CT Angiography in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Impact of Patient Characteristics and Different Venous Lines on Vessel Enhancement and Image Quality
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): W351 - W359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. D. Sostman, P. D. Stein, A. Gottschalk, F. Matta, R. Hull, and L. Goodman
Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Sensitivity and Specificity of Ventilation-Perfusion Scintigraphy in PIOPED II Study
Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 941 - 946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. D. MacKenzie, J. Nazario-Larrieu, T. Cai, M. S. Ledbetter, M. A. Duran-Mendicuti, P. F. Judy, and F. J. Rybicki
Reduced-Dose CT: Effect on Reader Evaluation in Detection of Pulmonary Embolism
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1371 - 1379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. M. Heyer, P. S. Mohr, S. P. Lemburg, S. A. Peters, and V. Nicolas
Image Quality and Radiation Exposure at Pulmonary CT Angiography with 100- or 120-kVp Protocol: Prospective Randomized Study
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 577 - 583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Scarsbrook, K. Bradley, F. Gleeson, A. M. Groves, S. J. Yates, T. Win, I. Kayani, J. Bomanji, and P. J. Ell
Perfusion Scintigraphy Still has Important Role in Evaluation of Majority of Pregnant Patients with Suspicion of Pulmonary Embolism
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 623 - 625.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Arakawa, T. Kohno, T. Hiki, and Y. Kaji
CT Pulmonary Angiography and CT Venography: Factors Associated with Vessel Enhancement
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): 156 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Wittram
How I Do It: CT Pulmonary Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): 1255 - 1261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. G. Vrachliotis, K. G. Bis, A. Haidary, R. Kosuri, M. Balasubramaniam, M. Gallagher, G. Raff, M. Ross, B. O'Neil, and W. O'Neill
Atypical Chest Pain: Coronary, Aortic, and Pulmonary Vasculature Enhancement at Biphasic Single-Injection 64-Section CT Angiography
Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 368 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
M R Jones and J H Reid
Emergency chest radiology: thoracic aortic disease and pulmonary embolism
Imaging, September 1, 2006; 18(3): 122 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Adequate Enhancement at CT for Pulmonary Embolism
Lacey Washington, et al.
Radiology Online, 21 Sep 2006 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.