Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print August 26, 2005, 10.1148/radiol.2371041079
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2371041079v1
237/1/83    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ko, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Rusinek, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ko, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Rusinek, H.
(Radiology 2005;237:83-88.)
© RSNA, 2005


Computer Applications

Effect of CT Image Compression on Computer-assisted Lung Nodule Volume Measurement1

Jane P. Ko, MD, Jeffrey Chang, MD, Elan Bomsztyk, BS, James S. Babb, PhD, David P. Naidich, MD and Henry Rusinek, PhD

1 From the Thoracic Imaging Section, Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, 560 First Ave, New York, NY 10016. Received June 18, 2004; revision requested August 26; revision received October 19; accepted November 26. J.P.K. supported by National Institutes of Health grant K23 CA096604. Address correspondence to J.P.K. (e-mail: jane.ko{at}nyumc.org).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of two-dimensional wavelet-based computed tomographic (CT) image compression according to the Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) 2000 standard on computer-assisted assessment of nodule volume.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the research board at the authors' institution; patients' informed consent was not required. Fifty-one nodules in 23 patients (seven men, 16 women; mean age, 59 years; age range, 39–75 years) were selected on low-dose CT scans that were compressed to levels of 10:1, 20:1, 30:1, and 40:1 by using a two-dimensional JPEG 2000 wavelet-based image compression method. Nodules were classified according to size (≤5 mm or >5 mm in diameter), location (central, peripheral, or abutting pleura or fissures), and attenuation (solid, calcified, or subsolid). Regions of interest were placed on the original images and transposed onto compressed images. Nodule volumes on original (noncompressed) and compressed images were measured by using a computer-assisted method. A mixed-model analysis of variance was conducted for statistical evaluation.

RESULTS: Nodule volumes averaged 388.1 mm3 (range, 34–3474 mm3). There were three calcified, 33 solid noncalcified, and 15 subsolid nodules (13 with ground-glass attenuation). Average volume decreased with increasing compression level, to 383 mm3 (10:1), 370 mm3 (20:1), 360 mm3 (30:1), and 354 mm3 (40:1). No significant difference was identified between measurements obtained on original images and those compressed to a level of 10:1. Significant differences were noted, however, between original images and those compressed to a level of 20:1 or greater (P < .05). Compression level significantly interacted with nodule size, location, and attenuation (P < .001). The effect of compression was greater for nodules with ground-glass attenuation than for those with higher attenuation values. The difference in mean volumes between original images and those compressed to a level of 20:1 was 34.9 mm3 for nodules with ground-glass attenuation, compared with 8.3 mm3 for higher-attenuation nodules, a 4.2-fold difference.

CONCLUSION: Nodule volumes measured on images compressed to a level of 20:1 differed significantly from those measured on noncompressed images, especially for nodules with ground-glass attenuation. This difference could affect the assessment of nodule change in size as measured with computer-assisted methods.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
V. Bajpai, K. H. Lee, B. Kim, K. J. Kim, T. J. Kim, Y. H. Kim, and H. S. Kang
Differences in Compression Artifacts on Thin- and Thick-Section Lung CT Images
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): W38 - W43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. Kim, K. H. Lee, K. J. Kim, R. Mantiuk, S. Hahn, T. J. Kim, and Y. H. Kim
Prediction of Perceptible Artifacts in JPEG 2000 Compressed Chest CT Images Using Mathematical and Perceptual Quality Metrics
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 328 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. S. Woo, K. J. Kim, T. J. Kim, S. Hahn, B. Kim, Y. H. Kim, and K. H. Lee
JPEG 2000 Compression of Abdominal CT: Difference in Tolerance Between Thin- and Thick-Section Images
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2007; 189(3): 535 - 541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. F. Branstetter IV
Basics of Imaging Informatics: Part 1
Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 656 - 667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.