Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2372031637
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, J. A.
(Radiology 2005;237:383-384.)
© RSNA, 2005


Special Series

Responsible Conduct of Radiology Research Part IV. The Boundary of Research and Practice1

Jeffrey A. Cooper, MD, MMM

1 From the Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs, 915 15th St NW, Suite 900, Washington, DC 20005-2315, and the Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa. Received October 8, 2003; revision requested January 5, 2004; revision received May 6; accepted June 14. Address correspondence to the author (e-mail: jcooper{at}aahrpp.org).

The purpose of this series of articles is to explain the ethical and legal basis for responsible conduct of radiology research and the rules that an investigator must follow. Part four of this series explains special situations that commonly arise during human research in radiology. The boundaries of research and innovative care or quality improvement often are not clear. When human research activities are or become subject to regulation, they must be reviewed and approved by an institutional review board. Therefore, physicians performing innovative care or conducting quality improvement should have a low threshold for seeking institutional review board guidance. Physicians performing innovative care should also consider their ethical obligation to future patients to conduct research to prove the validity of such innovative care.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. B. Wolbarst and W. R. Hendee
The National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering and NIH Grant Process: An Overview
Radiology, January 1, 2007; 242(1): 32 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.