|
|
||||||||
Head and Neck Imaging |
1 From the Department of Radiology (C.d.M., F.C., T.T.d.W., A.v.d.L.) and Neurology (D.A.M.S., D.W.J.D.), Erasmus Medical Center, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands. From the 2003 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received April 9, 2004; revision requested June 22; final revision received November 10; accepted December 14. Supported by Revolving Fund 2002, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam. Address correspondence to A.v.d.L. (e-mail: a.vanderlugt{at}erasmusmc.nl).
PURPOSE: To prospectively compare different volumes of intravenously administered contrast material with and without a bolus chaser at 16detector row computed tomographic (CT) angiography of the carotid arteries.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent were obtained. Seventy-five consecutive patients (44 men, 31 women; mean age, 63 years; range, 2285 years) were allocated to one of three protocols: group 1, 80 mL of contrast material; group 2, 80 mL of contrast material followed by 40 mL of saline; and group 3, 60 mL of contrast material followed by 40 mL of saline. Bolus tracking was used to synchronize contrast material injection with CT scanning. The attenuation in Hounsfield units was measured from the ascending aorta to the intracranial arteries at 1-second intervals. Differences were tested with the Student t test.
RESULTS: The maximum attenuation was reached in the proximal internal carotid artery in all groups. The addition of a bolus chaser to 80-mL contrast material resulted in a higher mean attenuation (323 HU ± 39 vs 351 HU ± 60, P = .06), higher maximum attenuation (393 HU ± 53 vs 425 HU ± 76, P = .09), and higher minimum attenuation (240 HU ± 34 vs 264 HU ± 48, P < .05). Group 3 had lower mean, maximum, and minimum attenuation than did groups 1 and 2 (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: The addition of a bolus chaser to 80 mL of contrast material results in a slightly higher attenuation. Decreasing the volume of contrast material from 80 to 60 mL results in a significantly lower attenuation.
© RSNA, 2005
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. T. de Weert, M. Ouhlous, E. Meijering, P. E. Zondervan, J. M. Hendriks, M. R.H.M. van Sambeek, D. W.J. Dippel, and A. van der Lugt In Vivo Characterization and Quantification of Atherosclerotic Carotid Plaque Components With Multidetector Computed Tomography and Histopathological Correlation Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2006; 26(10): 2366 - 2372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rosovsky and H. Rusinek Dose-related Nephrotoxicity. Radiology, August 1, 2006; 240(2): 614 - 614. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. de Monye, T. T. de Weert, W. Zaalberg, F. Cademartiri, D. A. M. Siepman, D. W. J. Dippel, and A. van der Lugt Optimization of CT angiography of the carotid artery with a 16-MDCT scanner: craniocaudal scan direction reduces contrast material-related perivenous artifacts. Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1737 - 1745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |