Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2373041619
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Okada, M.
Right arrow Articles by Albrecht, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Okada, M.
Right arrow Articles by Albrecht, T.
(Radiology 2005;237:1063-1067.)
© RSNA, 2005


Technical Developments

Bolus versus Continuous Infusion of Microbubble Contrast Agent for Liver US: Initial Experience1

Masahiro Okada, MD, Christian W. Hoffmann, MD, Karl J. Wolf, MD and Thomas Albrecht, MD, FRCR

1 From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Received September 19, 2004; revision requested November 24; revision received January 31, 2005; accepted February 28. Address correspondence to M.O., Department of Radiology, Kinki University School of Medicine, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka 589-8511, Japan (e-mail: mokada{at}rad.med.kindai.ac.jp).

Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. To prospectively assess if continuous infusion of galactose-palmitic acid can prolong the duration of hepatic enhancement at ultrasonography over bolus injection, 11 patients received two injections—one bolus injection (2 mL/sec) and one continuous infusion (1.5 mL/min)—with the same dose of galactose-palmitic acid (4 g, 300 mg/dL). Two unenhanced baseline sweep scans (mechanical index of 0.7 and 1.3) of the relevant liver lobe were acquired followed by contrast-enhanced sweeps after bolus injection and continuous infusion. Each sweep was saved as cine loops and analyzed with a personal computer. Duration of enhancement more than 3 dB was prolonged by continuous infusion from 4.3 minutes ± 2.4 (±standard deviation) at bolus injection to 10.1 minutes ± 3.0 (P < .005). Maximal parenchymal enhancement was 11.0 dB ± 3.2 (bolus injection) and 9.2 dB ± 3.8 (infusion, P < .05). Peak liver-to-lesion contrast was 14.2 dB ± 6.3 (bolus injection) and 13.2 dB ± 7.1 (infusion, not significant). Continuous infusion of galactose-palmitic acid markedly prolongs but slightly diminishes hepatic enhancement; liver-to-lesion contrast remains unchanged.

© RSNA, 2005







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.