Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print October 19, 2005, 10.1148/radiol.2373041950
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2373041950v1
237/3/911    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haaga, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Tarcha, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haaga, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Tarcha, P. J.
(Radiology 2005;237:911-918.)
© RSNA, 2005


Experimental Studies

Combined Tumor Therapy by Using Radiofrequency Ablation and 5-FU–Laden Polymer Implants: Evaluation in Rats and Rabbits1

John R. Haaga, MD, Agata A. Exner, PhD, Yadong Wang, PhD, Nicholas T. Stowe, PhD{dagger} and Peter J. Tarcha, PhD

1 From the Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland and Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106-5056 (J.R.H., A.A.E., N.T.S.); Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass (Y.W.); and Department of Advanced Drug Delivery, Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Ill (P.J.T.). Received November 18, 2004; revision requested January 6, 2005; revision received February 11; accepted March 15. Address correspondence to A.A.E. (e-mail: Exner{at}uhrad.com).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-laden polymer implants as an adjunct to radiofrequency (RF) ablation for tumor treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: All animal studies were performed in compliance with the Case Western Reserve University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. Three studies were performed to investigate (a) in vitro dissolution of 5-FU–laden polymer implants in saline and bovine serum, (b) tissue distribution of 5-FU and its metabolite, 5-fluorouridine (5-FUrd), in the ablated liver tissue of rats (n = 4), and (c) efficacy of combined approach (n = 4) compared with that of ablation alone (n = 6) for VX2 liver tumor model in rabbits. Characterization of 5-FU release in vitro and distribution of 5-FU in rat liver tissue were analyzed by using high performance liquid chromatography; in vivo efficacy was assessed by using computed tomography and pathologic examination.

RESULTS: Results of the in vitro dissolution study showed that a 75% release of 5-FU occurred in 2 days when exposed to bovine serum and in 9 days when exposed to phosphate-buffered saline. In the ablated rat liver, the 5-FU level was higher at the center and lower at the periphery of the tissue both at 24 hours (41.0 mg per kilogram tissue vs 15.0 mg per kilogram tissue, respectively) and at 48 hours (8.0 mg per kilogram tissue vs 2.0 mg per kilogram tissue, respectively). The 5-FUrd concentration was twofold higher peripherally than centrally and was higher at 48 hours than at 24 hours. In rabbits, local delivery of 5-FU immediately after RF ablation provided a significant (P < .05) reduction in tumor size compared with ablation alone (1.80 cm3 ± 0.28 [standard error] vs 3.53 cm3 ± 0.52, respectively; P = .034) and a more than 20-fold reduction in tumor size compared with the control (1.80 cm3 ± 0.28 vs 41.95 cm3 ± 11.58, respectively; P = .018).

CONCLUSION: Combined treatment by using 5-FU polymer implants and RF ablation shows uniform sustained release of 5-FU for 48 hours at least 8 mm from the edge of the ablation zone and appears to be successful at controlling the growth of an experimental tumor in rabbits appreciably better than does ablation alone.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. D. Weinberg, T. M. Krupka, J. R. Haaga, and A. A. Exner
Combination of Sensitizing Pretreatment and Radiofrequency Tumor Ablation: Evaluation in Rat Model
Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 796 - 803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.