Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2381041595
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herzog, C.
Right arrow Articles by Vogl, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herzog, C.
Right arrow Articles by Vogl, T. J.
(Radiology 2006;238:75-86.)
© RSNA, 2006


Cardiac Imaging

Multi–Detector Row CT Coronary Angiography: Influence of Reconstruction Technique and Heart Rate on Image Quality1

Christopher Herzog, MD, Maric Arning-Erb, Stefan Zangos, MD, Kathrin Eichler, MD, Renate Hammerstingl, MD, Selami Dogan, MD, Hanns Ackermann, PhD and Thomas J. Vogl, MD

1 From the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (C.H., M.A., S.Z., K.E., R.H., T.J.V.), Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (S.D.), and Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics (H.A.), Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany. Received September 15, 2004; revision requested November 24; revision received February 3, 2005; accepted February 28. Address correspondence to C.H. (e-mail: C.Herzog{at}em.uni-frankfurt.de).

Purpose: To prospectively evaluate to what extent image quality in 16–detector row computed tomographic (CT) coronary angiography is a function of the heart rate and the image reconstruction technique used.

Materials and Methods: A total of 70 patients (49 men, 21 women; mean age, 59.1 years ± 5.8 [standard deviation]) consecutively underwent multi–detector row CT coronary angiography; 49 patients additionally underwent coronary angiography. Image reconstruction was based on both relative and absolute timing. A total of 20 equidistant relative and absolute image reconstructed intervals were assessed by applying a four-step grading scale. Cluster and discrimination analysis, Spearman correlation analysis, and Wilcoxon and {chi}2 tests were used for statistical analysis. Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtained.

Results: Though significantly (P < .001) better image quality was observed for image reconstruction based on absolute timing and in patients with lower heart rates, influence on diagnostic accuracy was not significant. Irrespective of the reconstruction technique used, best image quality was observed in patients with a low heart rate for middiastolic reconstruction intervals (starting points: 61% of R-R interval [range, 40%–75%] and 599.3 msec after R [range, 450–840 msec]) and in patients with a high heart rate for end-systolic or early-diastolic intervals (starting points: 27.3% of R-R interval [range, 10%–45%] and 202.3 msec after R [range, 82–336 msec]). With regard to the vessel section and reconstruction technique, cutoff heart rates of the intervals were 64.0–68.5 beats per minute. Patients with stenoses of more than 50% were identified with 86% sensitivity and specificity, and there was no significant difference between relative and absolute timing (P = .99).

Conclusion: In multi–detector row CT coronary angiography, image quality depends on the choice of a suited reconstruction interval. In patients with high heart rates, the best image quality can be obtained with end-systolic and early-diastolic intervals; in patients with low heart rates, the best results are achieved with middiastolic intervals.

© RSNA, 2006




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
B. A. Herzog, L. Husmann, N. Burkhard, O. Gaemperli, I. Valenta, F. Tatsugami, C. A. Wyss, U. Landmesser, and P. A. Kaufmann
Accuracy of low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography using prospective electrocardiogram-triggering: first clinical experience
Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2008; 29(24): 3037 - 3042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
H. Doi, R. Koshima, M. Suzuki, K. Takahashi, H. Yokoyama, and N. Yoshida
Can 64-Row Computed Tomography Replace Angiography After Coronary Bypass?
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2008; 16(6): 444 - 449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Matsumoto, T. Kondo, S. Watanabe, R. Kikumoto, T. Shimada, Y. Hiraoka, and K. Ueda
ECG-Edited Middiastolic Phase Reconstruction Improves Image Quality at 64-MDCT Coronary Angiography of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2008; 191(6): 1659 - 1666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. Hirai, J. Horiguchi, C. Fujioka, M. Kiguchi, H. Yamamoto, N. Matsuura, T. Kitagawa, H. Teragawa, N. Kohno, and K. Ito
Prospective versus Retrospective ECG-gated 64-Detector Coronary CT Angiography: Assessment of Image Quality, Stenosis, and Radiation Dose
Radiology, August 1, 2008; 248(2): 424 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Leschka, H. Scheffel, L. Husmann, O. Gamperli, B. Marincek, P. A. Kaufmann, and H. Alkadhi
Effect of Decrease in Heart Rate Variability on the Diagnostic Accuracy of 64-MDCT Coronary Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): 1583 - 1590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. Brodoefel, C. Burgstahler, I. Tsiflikas, A. Reimann, S. Schroeder, C. D. Claussen, M. Heuschmid, and A. F. Kopp
Dual-Source CT: Effect of Heart Rate, Heart Rate Variability, and Calcification on Image Quality and Diagnostic Accuracy
Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 346 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
S. Achenbach, U. Ropers, A. Kuettner, K. Anders, T. Pflederer, S. Komatsu, W. Bautz, W. G. Daniel, and D. Ropers
Randomized Comparison of 64-Slice Single- and Dual-Source Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., March 1, 2008; 1(2): 177 - 186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. T. Johnson, J. Eng, H. K. Pannu, and E. K. Fishman
64-MDCT Angiography of the Coronary Arteries: Nationwide Survey of Patient Preparation Practice
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): 743 - 747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Horiguchi, M. Kiguchi, C. Fujioka, Y. Shen, R. Arie, K. Sunasaka, and K. Ito
Radiation Dose, Image Quality, Stenosis Measurement, and CT Densitometry Using ECG-Triggered Coronary 64-MDCT Angiography: A Phantom Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 315 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
U. Ropers, D. Ropers, T. Pflederer, K. Anders, A. Kuettner, N. I. Stilianakis, S. Komatsu, W. Kalender, W. Bautz, W. G. Daniel, et al.
Influence of Heart Rate on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Dual-Source Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 18, 2007; 50(25): 2393 - 2398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. Oncel, G. Oncel, and A. Tastan
Effectiveness of Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography for the Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Initial Experience
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 703 - 711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Seifarth, S. Wienbeck, M. Pusken, K.-U. Juergens, D. Maintz, C. Vahlhaus, W. Heindel, and R. Fischbach
Optimal Systolic and Diastolic Reconstruction Windows for Coronary CT Angiography Using Dual-Source CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1317 - 1323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. M. Colletti
Coronary CT Angiography Without {beta}-Blockers
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1324 - 1325.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. Husmann, S. Leschka, L. Desbiolles, T. Schepis, O. Gaemperli, B. Seifert, P. Cattin, T. Frauenfelder, T. G. Flohr, B. Marincek, et al.
Coronary Artery Motion and Cardiac Phases: Dependency on Heart Rate Implications for CT Image Reconstruction
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 567 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Matt, H. Scheffel, S. Leschka, T. G. Flohr, B. Marincek, P. A. Kaufmann, and H. Alkadhi
Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography: Image Quality, Mean Heart Rate, and Heart Rate Variability
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2007; 189(3): 567 - 573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Herzog, P. L. Zwerner, J. R. Doll, C. D. Nielsen, S. A. Nguyen, G. Savino, T. J. Vogl, P. Costello, and U. J. Schoepf
Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparison on Per-Patient and Per-Vessel or Per-Segment Basis at 64-Section CT Angiography
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 112 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
U. J. Schoepf, P. L. Zwerner, G. Savino, C. Herzog, J. M. Kerl, and P. Costello
Coronary CT Angiography
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 48 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Achenbach
Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 21, 2006; 48(10): 1919 - 1928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
C. M. Jones, T. Athanasiou, N. Dunne, J. Kirby, S. Attaran, A. Chow, S. Purkayastha, and A. Darzi
Multi-slice computed tomography in coronary artery disease.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 30(3): 443 - 450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
A S Lowe and C L Kay
Recent developments in CT: a review of the clinical applications and advantages of multidetector computed tomography
Imaging, June 1, 2006; 18(2): 62 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Radiological Society of North America.