|
|
||||||||
Experimental Studies |
1 From the Depts of Radiology (V.L.W., C.E.B., K.J.S., R.L.L., V.V., D.Z., P.S.D., G.A.T.), Urology (M.S., D.L.M., C.A.P.), and Orthopedics (D.Z.), Children's Hosp, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115. Received Aug 23, 2004; revision requested Nov 5; revision received Mar 11, 2005; final version accepted Apr 8. Supported in part by Philips Medical Systems of North America, Children's Hosp Radiology Foundation and a Bridge Award from Harvard Medical School Minority Faculty Development Program. Address correspondence to V.L.W. (e-mail: valerie.ward{at}childrens.harvard.edu).
Purpose: To compare grid-controlled variable-rate pulsed fluoroscopy (GCPFL) and continuous fluoroscopy (CFL) for the reduction of radiation exposure during voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) in a pediatric porcine model of vesicoureteral reflux.
Materials and Methods: Institutional animal care and use committee approval was obtained. Vesicoureteral reflux was simulated in four pigs, and 48 VCUG studies were performed (24 with GCPFL, 24 with CFL). VCUG was performed at abdominal girths of 810 cm (group 1, simulates human newborn to 6-month-old infant), 1213 cm (group 2, simulates 23-year-old child), and 1517 cm (group 3, simulates 10-year-old child). An electronic device calculated total radiation exposure during fluoroscopy and image recording. With five-point ordinal scales, VCUG images were scored independently for anatomic conspicuity and overall diagnostic quality by two radiologists (radiologists A and B). An analysis of variance was used to compare radiation exposures and fluoroscopy times between GCPFL and CFL and to determine whether radiation exposure and fluoroscopy time were dependent on the pig's abdominal girth. The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient was used to assess whether fluoroscopy time was correlated with radiation exposure. Anatomic conspicuity and diagnostic quality scores were compared by means of the Wilcoxon signed rank test.
Results: Results of analysis of variance revealed that GCPFL resulted in a significant reduction in total radiation exposure compared with CFL for each of the three groups (P < .05 for each comparison), and this reduction was most marked in the larger animals. There were no significant differences in diagnostic quality of the recorded VCUG images (P > .05). Anatomic conspicuity was not significantly different for groups 2 and 3, but there was a significantly higher score for GCPFL in group 1 for radiologist A (P = .04).
Conclusion: By using GCPFL in the performance of VCUG in a pediatric porcine model of vesicoureteral reflux, total radiation exposure can be reduced by a factor of 4.67.5 lower than with CFL, and diagnostic-quality images can be obtained.
© RSNA, 2006
Related Article
Radiology 2006 238: 1-2.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Hernanz-Schulman Science to Practice: Can Fluoroscopic Radiation Dose Be Substantially Reduced? Radiology, January 1, 2006; 238(1): 1 - 2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |