Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2382041441
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wacker, F. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lewin, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wacker, F. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lewin, J. S.
(Radiology 2006;238:497-504.)
© RSNA, 2006

Experimental Studies

An Augmented Reality System for MR Image–guided Needle Biopsy: Initial Results in a Swine Model1

Frank K. Wacker, MD, Sebastian Vogt, MS, Ali Khamene, PhD, John A. Jesberger, Sherif G. Nour, MD, Daniel R. Elgort, PhD, Frank Sauer, PhD, Jeffrey L. Duerk, PhD and Jonathan S. Lewin, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (F.K.W., J.A.J., S.G.N., D.R.E., J.L.D.); Department of Radiology, Charité-Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, Berlin 12200, Germany (F.K.W); Department of Imaging and Visualization, Siemens Corporate Research, Princeton, NJ (S.V., A.K., F.S.); and Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (J.S.L.). From the 2004 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received August 19, 2004; revision requested October 28; revision received December 28; accepted February 1, 2005; final version accepted May 20. Supported in part by Siemens Medical Solutions research grant and NCI grants R33CA88144 and R01CA81431. Address correspondence to F.K.W. (e-mail: frank.wacker{at}charite.de).

Purpose: To evaluate an augmented reality (AR) system in combination with a 1.5-T closed-bore magnetic resonance (MR) imager as a navigation tool for needle biopsies.

Materials and Methods: The experimental protocol had institutional animal care and use committee approval. Seventy biopsies were performed in phantoms by using 20 tube targets, each with a diameter of 6 mm, and 50 virtual targets. The position of the needle tip in AR and MR space was compared in multiple imaging planes, and virtual and real needle tip localization errors were calculated. Ten AR-guided biopsies were performed in three pigs, and the duration of each procedure was determined. After successful puncture, the distance to the target was measured on MR images. The confidence limits for the achieved in-plane hit rate and for lateral deviation were calculated. A repeated measures analysis of variance was used to determine whether the placement error in a particular dimension (x, y, or z) differed from the others.

Results: For the 50 virtual targets, a mean error of 1.1 mm ± 0.5 (standard deviation) was calculated. A repeated measures analysis of variance indicated no statistically significant difference (P > .99) in the errors in any particular orientation. For the real targets, all punctures were inside the 6-mm-diameter tube in the transverse plane. The needle depth was within the target plane in 11 biopsy procedures; the mean distance to the center of the target was 2.55 mm (95% confidence interval: 1.77 mm, 3.34 mm). For nine biopsy procedures, the needle tip was outside the target plane, with a mean distance to the edge of the target plane of 1.5 mm (range, 0.07–3.46 mm). In the animal experiments, the puncture was successful in all 10 cases, with a mean target-needle distance of 9.6 mm ± 4.85. The average procedure time was 18 minutes per puncture.

Conclusion: Biopsy procedures performed with a combination of a closed-bore MR system and an AR system are feasible and accurate.

© RSNA, 2006