Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online before print January 5, 2006, 10.1148/radiol.2382042105
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2382042105v1
238/2/542    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lim, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Lim, H. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lim, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Lim, H. K.
(Radiology 2006;238:542-548.)
© RSNA, 2006

Gastrointestinal Imaging

Early Bile Duct Carcinoma: Comparison of Imaging Features with Pathologic Findings1

Jae Hoon Lim, MD, Kee-Taek Jang, MD, Dongil Choi, MD, Won Jae Lee, MD and Hyo Keun Lim, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (J.H.L., D.C., W.J.L., H.K.L.) and Pathology (K.T.J.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwon-dong, Kangnam-ku, Seoul 135-710, Korea. Received December 12, 2004; revision requested February 7, 2005; revision received February 15; accepted March 15; final version accepted April 18. Address correspondence to J.H.L. (e-mail: jhlim{at}smc.samsung.co.kr).

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the imaging features of early bile duct carcinoma and to compare these features with histopathologic findings.

Materials and Methods: The institutional review board did not require its approval or informed patient consent for this study. Twenty-one patients (13 men, eight women; mean age, 60 years; range, 48–75 years) with early bile duct carcinoma that was surgically resected and histopathologically confirmed were included. Ultrasonography (US) was performed in 15 patients, computed tomography (CT) in 21, cholangiography in 18, and magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography in six. Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed imaging features by consensus; they compared growth pattern of tumors, integrity of the bile duct wall that harbored the tumor, and periductal infiltration with histopathologic findings.

Results: Pathologic specimens showed intraluminal tumor growth in all cases. Tumors were confined to the mucosa in 11 patients and involved the fibromuscular layer in 10 patients. In four of the 10 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, four of the five hilar cholangiocarcinomas, and six of the six extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, there were intraductal tumor masses and the wall of the tumor-bearing bile ducts was preserved without periductal infiltration on US and CT images. On cholangiograms and MR cholangiograms, tumors were better delineated but the wall invasion could not be evaluated. No difference in image findings was found between carcinoma confined to the mucosa and carcinoma involving the fibromuscular layer.

Conclusion: Imaging features of early bile duct carcinoma are a tumor mass in the bile duct lumen and integrity of the tumor-bearing bile duct wall without infiltration outside the wall.

© RSNA, 2006