Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2382032065
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sodickson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tempany, C. M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sodickson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tempany, C. M. C.
(Radiology 2006;238:549-559.)
© RSNA, 2006


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Three-dimensional Fast-Recovery Fast Spin-Echo MRCP: Comparison with Two-dimensional Single-Shot Fast Spin-Echo Techniques1

Aaron Sodickson, MD, PhD, Koenraad J. Mortele, MD, Matthew A. Barish, MD, Kelly H. Zou, PhD, Steven Thibodeau, BS, RT and Clare M. C. Tempany, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology (A.S., K.H.Z., S.T.), Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention (K.J.M., M.A.B., C.M.C.T.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115; and Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (K.H.Z.). Received December 18, 2003; revision requested February 20, 2004; revision received February 22, 2005; accepted March 17; final version accepted May 2. Address correspondence to A.S. (e-mail: asodickson{at}partners.org).

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the technical quality of and the visibility of the biliary tree and pancreatic duct on magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiopancreatographic (MRCP) images obtained with a single-breath-hold three-dimensional (3D) fast-recovery fast spin-echo (FRFSE) sequence in comparison with conventional two-dimensional (2D) single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) thin-section and thick-slab sequences.

Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained; informed consent was not required for this HIPAA-compliant study. MRCP was performed at 1.5 T in 53 consecutive patients (25 men and 28 women, aged 23–84 years). A single-breath-hold volume acquisition was performed by using the 3D FRFSE sequence and the conventional 2D SSFSE sequences. Two radiologists graded studies obtained with each sequence in a blinded fashion, and the paired Student t test was used to assess differences in technical quality, visibility of eight individual ductal segments of the biliary tree and pancreatic duct, and number of ductal segments visualized per patient.

Results: Studies obtained with 3D FRFSE were of significantly higher technical quality than those obtained with thin-section 2D SSFSE (P < .02 for both readers). The 3D FRFSE maximum intensity projection reconstruction and 2D SSFSE thick-slab sequence proved statistically equivalent with regard to the overall visibility of the biliary tree and pancreatic duct and the number of ductal segments visualized per patient. In comparison with 2D SSFSE thin-section imaging, however, 3D FRFSE imaging produced an improved overall duct segment visibility grade of 0.45 on a three-point visibility scale (P < .001), with a corresponding average per-patient improvement of 1.9 out of eight possible fully visualized duct segments (P < .001).

Conclusion: The 3D FRFSE sequence shows promise for improved visibility of the pancreatic duct and biliary tree, compared with the conventional 2D SSFSE thin-section and thick-slab approach, while permitting the entire MRCP examination to be performed in a single breath hold.

© RSNA, 2006




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
N. I. Sainani, O. A. Catalano, N.-S. Holalkere, A. X. Zhu, P. F. Hahn, and D. V. Sahani
Cholangiocarcinoma: Current and Novel Imaging Techniques
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2008; 28(5): 1263 - 1287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. S. Park, J. M. Lee, J.-Y. Choi, M. W. Lee, H. J. Kim, J. K. Han, and B. I. Choi
Preoperative Evaluation of Bile Duct Cancer: MRI Combined with MR Cholangiopancreatography Versus MDCT with Direct Cholangiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 396 - 405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. T. Heverhagen
Noise Measurement and Estimation in MR Imaging Experiments
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 638 - 639.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Radiological Society of North America.