Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2382041463
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sahani, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Hahn, P. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sahani, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Hahn, P. F.
(Radiology 2006;238:560-569.)
© RSNA, 2006


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm of Pancreas: Multi–Detector Row CT with 2D Curved Reformations—Correlation with MRCP1

Dushyant V. Sahani, MD, Rajagopal Kadavigere, MD, Michael Blake, MD, Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo, MD, Gregory Y. Lauwers, MD and Peter F. Hahn, MD

1 From the Departments of Abdominal Imaging and Interventions (D.V.S., R.K., M.B., P.F.H.), Surgery (C.F.), and Pathology (G.Y.L.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, White 270, Boston, MA 02114. Received August 26, 2004; revision requested October 29; revision received February 1, 2005; accepted February 28; final version accepted June 13. Address correspondence to D.V.S. (e-mail: dsahani{at}partners.org).

Purpose: To retrospectively compare accuracy of multi–detector row computed tomography (CT), combined with two-dimensional (2D) curved reformations, and that of magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for characterization of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) as malignant, with pathologic examination as reference standard.

Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained, informed consent was waived, and study was HIPAA compliant. Twenty-five patients (12 women, 13 men; age range, 44–88 years) with pathologically proved IPMN were examined with dual-phase CT with 1.25-mm-thick sections for pancreatic phase; 2D curved reformations along main pancreatic duct (MPD) were generated. T2-weighted MRCP included thick- and thin-slab single-shot fast spin-echo imaging and transverse fast spin-echo imaging. Two radiologists, blinded to surgical and pathologic findings, evaluated images for lesion location, septa, mural nodules, communication with MPD, extent and diameter of MPD dilatation, calcifications, and vascular encasement. Malignancy was suspected when one of the following was present: MPD diameter larger than 10 mm, mural nodules, vascular encasement, peripancreatic lymphadenopathy, or metastases. Sensitivity and specificity values for prediction of malignancy were calculated for CT and MRCP. Interobserver variability was determined ({kappa} analysis).

Results: Excellent correlation between modalities was observed. Cyst communication was seen in 20 and 21 of 24 branch pancreatic duct (BPD) IPMNs with CT and MRCP, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detection of malignancy were 70%, 87%, and 76% (CT) and 70%, 92%, and 80% (MRCP), respectively. Interobserver agreement was good to perfect for both readers in all comparisons (overall, {kappa} = 0.70–1.00).

Conclusion: CT combined with 2D curved reformation can provide imaging details of IPMN, including communication of BPD IPMN with MPD, that are almost equivalent to those provided at MRCP. Presence of mural nodules, dilated MPD (>10-mm diameter), or thick septa at CT or MRCP may be used as independent predictors of malignancy.

© RSNA, 2006




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Macari, T. Lee, S. Kim, S. Jacobs, A. J. Megibow, C. Hajdu, and J. Babb
Is Gadolinium Necessary for MRI Follow-Up Evaluation of Cystic Lesions in the Pancreas? Preliminary Results
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2009; 192(1): 159 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. Ogawa, S. Itoh, M. Ikeda, K. Suzuki, and S. Naganawa
Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm of the Pancreas: Assessment of the Likelihood of Invasiveness with Multisection CT
Radiology, September 1, 2008; 248(3): 876 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
C. Bassi, S. Crippa, and R. Salvia
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs): is it time to (sometimes) spare the knife?
Gut, March 1, 2008; 57(3): 287 - 289.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. D'Onofrio, A. J. Megibow, N. Faccioli, R. Malago, P. Capelli, M. Falconi, and R. P. Mucelli
Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Sonography and MRI in Displaying Anatomic Features of Cystic Pancreatic Masses
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1435 - 1442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. S. Katz, D. M. Friedel, D. Kho, N. Georgiou, and J. J. Hines
Relative Accuracy of CT and MRI for Characterization of Cystic Pancreatic Masses
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2007; 189(3): 657 - 661.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
R. Salvia, S. Crippa, M. Falconi, C. Bassi, A. Guarise, A. Scarpa, and P. Pederzoli
Branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: to operate or not to operate?
Gut, August 1, 2007; 56(8): 1086 - 1090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Radiological Society of North America.