Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2382041553
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Michaely, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Reiser, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Michaely, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Reiser, M. F.
(Radiology 2006;238:586-596.)
© RSNA, 2006


Genitourinary Imaging

Renal Artery Stenosis: Functional Assessment with Dynamic MR Perfusion Measurements—Feasibility Study1

Henrik J. Michaely, MD, Stefan O. Schoenberg, MD, Niels Oesingmann, PhD, Carina Ittrich, PhD, Christopher Buhlig, Denise Friedrich, RT, Anja Struwe, RT, Johannes Rieger, MD, Cornelia Reininger, MD, Walter Samtleben, MD, Max Weiss, MD and Maximilian F. Reiser, MD

1 From the Institute of Clinical Radiology, University Hospitals-Grosshadern (H.J.M., S.O.S., D.F., C.B., A.S., J.R., M.F.R.), Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology (W.S.), and Department of Pathology (M.W.), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany (N.O.); Central Unit Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (C.I.); and Research and Development, GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Ismaning, Germany (C.R.). From the 2004 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received September 8, 2004; revision requested November 12; revision received February 1, 2005; accepted February 25; final version accepted April 5. Address correspondence to H.J.M. (e-mail: henrik.michaely{at}med.uni-muenchen.de).

Purpose: To prospectively assess feasibility of renal magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion measurement method based on turbo fast low-angle shot sequences for grading effect of renal artery stenosis (RAS) on parenchymal perfusion.

Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approved this study, and patients gave written consent. Seventy-three patients (34 male, 39 female; age range, 17–84 years) who were clinically suspected of having RAS underwent contrast material–enhanced (gadodiamide) saturation-recovery turbo fast low-angle shot imaging for measurement of renal perfusion and high-spatial-resolution MR angiography for RAS detection and grading. Degree of stenosis was evaluated as high grade (≥75% stenosis), low to intermediate grade (>0% to <75% stenosis), or absent. High temporal resolution of the turbo fast low-angle shot sequence allowed acquisition of an exact first-pass tracing of the contrast agent bolus from which a signal intensity (SI)–time curve was derived. On the basis of this curve, mean transit time (MTT) of the contrast agent bolus, maximal upslope (MUS) of the curve, maximum SI, and time to SI peak (TTP) were calculated with a gamma variate fit. Wilcoxon rank sum test, Pearson product moment correlation, and paired t test were used for statistical analysis.

Results: Twenty-four renal arteries had high-grade RAS, 12 renal arteries had low- to intermediate-grade RAS, and 104 renal arteries had no RAS. Significant differences between patients without stenoses or with low- to intermediate-grade stenoses and patients with high-grade stenoses were found for MTT, MUS, and TTP (P < .001). Perfusion parameters were correlated with patients' serum creatinine levels, and significant correlations were found for MTT (r = 0.41), MUS (r = 0.48), and TTP (r = 0.4), with P < .001.

Conclusion: MR perfusion parameters can be used to assess effect of RAS on parenchymal perfusion. Perfusion measurements reflect renal function as measured with serum creatinine levels.

© RSNA, 2006




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
V. S. Lee, H. Rusinek, L. Bokacheva, A. J. Huang, N. Oesingmann, Q. Chen, M. Kaur, K. Prince, T. Song, E. L. Kramer, et al.
Renal function measurements from MR renography and a simplified multicompartmental model
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): F1548 - F1559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. J. Michaely, H. Kramer, N. Oesingmann, K.-P. Lodemann, M. F. Reiser, and S. O. Schoenberg
Semiquantitative Assessment of First-Pass Renal Perfusion at 1.5 T: Comparison of 2D Saturation Recovery Sequences With and Without Parallel Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2007; 188(4): 919 - 926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Radiological Society of North America.