Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print January 26, 2006, 10.1148/radiol.2382050133
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2382050133v1
238/3/900    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schroeder, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ruehm, S. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schroeder, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ruehm, S. G.
(Radiology 2006;238:900-910.)
© RSNA, 2006


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Evaluation of Living Liver Donors with an All-inclusive 3D Multi–Detector Row CT Protocol1

Tobias Schroeder, MD, Arnold Radtke, MD, Hilmar Kuehl, MD, Jörg F. Debatin, MD, MBA, Massimo Malagó, MD and Stefan G. Ruehm, MD

1 From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (T.S., H.K.) and Department of General Surgery and Transplantation (A.R., M.M.), University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, D-45122 Essen, Germany; University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (J.F.D.); and Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (S.G.R.). Received January 27, 2005; revision requested March 31; revision received April 15; accepted May 19; manuscript final version approval May 31. Supported in part by the German Research Society, Bonn, Germany, Grant KFO 117/1-1;A2.2. Address correspondence to T.S. (e-mail: Tobias.Schroeder{at}uni-essen.de).

Purpose: To prospectively assess parenchymal, vascular, and biliary anatomy of potential living liver donors with an all-inclusive multi–detector row computed tomographic (CT) approach.

Materials and Methods: A total of 250 potential living liver donors (112 women, 138 men; mean age, 37 years) underwent three-phase, dual-enhancement multi–detector row CT to delineate biliary, vascular, and parenchymal morphology according to an institutional review board–approved protocol. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects. For display of the biliary system, the first CT image set was collected after the infusion of a biliary contrast agent. CT angiography was subsequently performed, after automated injection of a conventional iodinated contrast agent, to display the arterial and portal-hepatic venous systems. All data sets were reconstructed in 1-mm sections. Data analysis was based on source images, multiplanar reconstructions, and three-dimensional postprocessing images; was performed in consensus by two radiologists; and was focused on the detection of biliary and vascular variants, exclusion of focal liver lesions, and determination of hepatic volumes. Preoperative findings were correlated with intraoperative findings (available in 62 subjects).

Results: Technical failures were experienced in 10 of 250 examinations. Twenty-seven subjects had moderate adverse reactions related to the biliary contrast agent. Benign hepatic lesions were detected in 61 candidates; one candidate had a renal cell carcinoma. Underlying biliary and vascular anatomy was displayed at least to the second intrahepatic branch in all but seven patients. Detected anatomic variants involved the biliary (38.8%), arterial (40.0%), portal venous (21.4%), and hepatic venous (43.5%) systems. Correlation with intraoperative findings was excellent. Some biliary (n = 4), arterial (n = 5), portal venous (n = 1), and hepatic venous (n = 6) variants were missed or misinterpreted at initial reading of preoperative data; however, variants could be retrospectively depicted in all but one biliary case and one hepatic venous case.

Conclusion: The outlined three-phase, dual-enhancement multi–detector row CT protocol represents an all-inclusive approach to evaluate potential living liver donors in a single diagnostic step.

© RSNA, 2006




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. S. Breiman, F. V. Coakley, E. M. Webb, J. J. Ellingson, J. P. Roberts, J. Kohr, J. Lutz, N. Knoess, and B. M. Yeh
CT Cholangiography in Potential Liver Donors: Effect of Premedication with Intravenous Morphine on Biliary Caliber and Visualization
Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 733 - 737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Heilmaier, R. Sutter, A. M. Lutz, B. Seifert, D. Weishaupt, B. Marincek, and J. K. Willmann
Mapping of Hepatic Vascular Anatomy: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Parallel MR Imaging Compared with 64 Detector Row CT
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 872 - 880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. M. Yeh, F. V. Coakley, A. C. Westphalen, B. N. Joe, C. E. Freise, A. Qayyum, R. A. McTaggart, and J. P. Roberts
Predicting Biliary Complications in Right Lobe Liver Transplant Recipients according to Distance between Donor's Bile Duct and Corresponding Hepatic Artery
Radiology, January 1, 2007; 242(1): 144 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Radiological Society of North America.