Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print February 28, 2006, 10.1148/radiol.2391050102
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2391050102v1
239/1/174    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Cho, K.-S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Cho, K.-S.
(Radiology 2006;239:174-180.)
© RSNA, 2006


Genitourinary Imaging

Renal Angiomyolipoma with Minimal Fat: Differentiation from Other Neoplasms at Double-Echo Chemical Shift FLASH MR Imaging1

Jeong Kon Kim, MD, Soo Hyun Kim, MD, Yoon Jin Jang, MD, Hanjong Ahn, MD, Choung-Soo Kim, MD, Hyungkeun Park, MD, Jun Woo Lee, MD, Suk Kim, MD and Kyoung-Sik Cho, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (J.K.K., S.H.K., Y.J.J., K.S.C.) and Urology (H.A., C.S.K., H.P.), Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, 388-1 Poongnap-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, South Korea; and Department of Radiology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan, South Korea (J.W.L., S.K.). Received January 25, 2005; revision requested March 29; revision received May 18; final version accepted June 21. Address correspondence to J.K.K. (e-mail: rialto{at}amc.seoul.kr).

Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of double-echo gradient-echo (GRE) chemical shift magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the differentiation of angiomyolipoma (AML) with minimal fat from other renal neoplasms, with pathologic examination or follow-up data serving as the reference standard.

Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Double-echo GRE chemical shift MR imaging was performed in 55 patients (29 men and 26 women; mean age, 49 years ± 14 [standard deviation]) with 55 renal tumors, including 37 (67%) pathologically proved tumors (23 renal cell carcinomas, nine AMLs, two oncocytomas, two lymphomas, and one reninoma) and 18 (33%) clinically diagnosed tumors (17 AMLs and one indeterminate malignancy). All tumors showed no intratumoral fat and had homogeneous enhancement and a prolonged or gradual enhancement pattern on biphasic helical computed tomographic scans. Signal intensity was measured in the renal tumor and spleen on in-phase and opposed-phase images. The signal intensity index and tumor-to-spleen ratio in AMLs and non-AMLs were calculated and compared with the Student t test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the signal intensity index and tumor-to-spleen ratio and to extract the optimal cut-off values in the differentiation of AMLs and non-AMLs.

Results: The signal intensity index and tumor-to-spleen ratio were different between AMLs (42% ± 11 and –43% ± 17, respectively) and non-AMLs (5% ± 14 and –4% ± 16, respectively) (P < .001). The area under the ROC curve was 0.975 for the signal intensity index and 0.952 for the tumor-to-spleen ratio. For differentiation of AMLs from non-AMLs, sensitivity and specificity were (a) 96% and 93%, respectively, with a signal intensity index of 25% and (b) 88% and 97%, respectively, with a tumor-to-spleen ratio of –32%.

Conclusion: Double-echo GRE chemical shift MR imaging can be used to differentiate AML with minimal fat from other renal neoplasms.

© RSNA, 2006




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
I. Pedrosa, M. R. Sun, M. Spencer, E. M. Genega, A. F. Olumi, W. C. Dewolf, and N. M. Rofsky
MR Imaging of Renal Masses: Correlation with Findings at Surgery and Pathologic Analysis
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2008; 28(4): 985 - 1003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
O. A. Catalano, A. E. Samir, D. V. Sahani, and P. F. Hahn
Pixel Distribution Analysis: Can It be Used to Distinguish Clear Cell Carcinomas from Angiomyolipomas with Minimal Fat?
Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 738 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
L R Williams, M J Oldale, and A J Bradley
Imaging renal masses and staging renal tumours
Imaging, March 1, 2008; 20(1): 73 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. R. Prasad, V. R. Surabhi, C. O. Menias, A. A. Raut, and K. N. Chintapalli
Benign Renal Neoplasms in Adults: Cross-Sectional Imaging Findings
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 158 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Y. Kim, J. K. Kim, N. Kim, and K.-S. Cho
CT Histogram Analysis: Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma without Visible Fat from Renal Cell Carcinoma at CT Imaging
Radiology, December 19, 2007; (2007) 2462061312.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Radiological Society of North America.