|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thoracic Imaging |
1 From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences (K.A., Y.N., T.N., D.L., K.K., S.M., Y.Y.), and Department of Radiological Technology, School of Health Sciences (Y.F.), Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjyo, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan; and Bio-IT Business Development Group, Fujitsu, Chiba, Japan (K.M., A.O.). Received February 6, 2005; revision requested April 6; revision received May 10; final version accepted June 13. Address correspondence to K.A.
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system on the diagnostic performance of radiologists for the estimation of the malignancy of pulmonary nodules on thin-section helical computed tomographic (CT) scans.
Materials and Methods: The institutional review board approved use of the CT database; informed specific study-related consent was waived. The institutional review board approved participation of radiologists; informed consent was obtained from all observers. Thirty-three (18 malignant, 15 benign) pulmonary nodules of less than 3.0 cm in maximal diameter were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with a continuous rating scale was used to compare observer performance for the estimation of the likelihood of malignancy first without and then with the CAD system. The participants were 10 board-certified radiologists and nine radiology residents.
Results: For all 19 participants, the mean area under the best-fit ROC curve (Az) values achieved without and with the CAD system were 0.843 ± 0.097 (standard deviation) and 0.924 ± 0.043, respectively. The difference was significant (P = .021). The mean Az values achieved without and with the CAD system were 0.910 ± 0.052 and 0.944 ± 0.040, respectively, for the 10 board-certified radiologists (P = .190) and 0.768 ± 0.078 and 0.901 ± 0.036, respectively, for the nine radiology residents (P = .009).
Conclusion: Use of the CAD system significantly (P = .009) improved the diagnostic performance of radiology residents for assessment of the malignancy of pulmonary nodules; however, it did not improve that of board-certified radiologists.
© RSNA, 2006
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Oda, K. Awai, D. Liu, T. Nakaura, Y. Yanaga, H. Nomori, and Y. Yamashita Ground-Glass Opacities on Thin-Section Helical CT: Differentiation Between Bronchioloalveolar Carcinoma and Atypical Adenomatous Hyperplasia Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1363 - 1368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ikeda, K. Awai, T. Mori, K. Kawanaka, Y. Yamashita, and H. Nomori Differential Diagnosis of Ground-Glass Opacity Nodules: CT Number Analysis by Three-Dimensional Computerized Quantification Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3): 984 - 990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Parrish Volume CT: State-of-the-Art Reporting Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2007; 189(3): 528 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Park, J. M. Goo, H. J. Lee, C. H. Lee, E. J. Chun, and J.-G. Im Nodular Ground-Glass Opacity at Thin-Section CT: Histologic Correlation and Evaluation of Change at Follow-up RadioGraphics, March 1, 2007; 27(2): 391 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |