HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schueller-Weidekamm, C. Articles by Ullrich, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schueller-Weidekamm, C. Articles by Ullrich, R.

Dynamic CT Measurement of Pulmonary Enhancement in Piglets with Experimental Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome¹

¹ From the Departments of Radiology (C.S., M.P., C.H.) and Anesthesia and General Intensive Care (M.Z., P.G., R.U.), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, 18-20 Waehringer Guertel, 1090 Vienna, Austria; and the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, Austria (E.W., H.R.). From the 2002 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received December 22, 2004; revision requested February 23, 2005; revision received April 11; accepted May 9; final version accepted July 18. Address correspondence to R.U. (e-mail: roman.ullrich{at}meduniwien.ac.at).

Purpose: To investigate whether analysis of a washout curve of contrast material obtained with serial computed tomography (CT) enables differentiation between hydrostatic pulmonary edema and pulmonary edema caused by increased capillary permeability.

Materials and Methods: The institutional committee on animal experiments approved this study, which was performed in accordance with designated guidelines. Chest CT was performed in 12 piglets after induction of anesthesia and start of mechanical ventilation. Dynamic CT was performed before and after induction of hydrostatic edema (n = 5) or oleic acid–induced increased vascular permeability edema (n = 7). Scans were obtained over 240 seconds during inspiratory breath holding at a single representative subcarinal level in the lungs. This anatomic level was kept constant and included areas of normal ventilation before and after induction of pulmonary edema and areas of ground-glass opacity and consolidation after induction of pulmonary edema. Measured lung attenuation in the regions of interest was normalized to that before contrast material injection and plotted as a function of time. Statistical analysis was performed by using two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures.

Results: In general, before induction of pulmonary edema, attenuation of normally aerated lung areas did not increase after the initial peak of enhancement during the first pass of contrast material. In animals with hydrostatic edema, no attenuation changes in areas of ground-glass opacity were observed after the initial peak. Conversely, lung attenuation increased continuously in animals with oleic acid–induced high-permeability pulmonary edema (P = .002). After induction of lung edema, pulmonary enhancement measured in lung regions with normal ventilation or consolidation did not change in either group. Pulmonary fluid accumulation 90 minutes after induction of edema did not significantly differ between groups.

Conclusion: Dynamic contrast–material enhanced CT can help differentiate between permeability and hydrostatic lung edema in an animal model.

© RSNA, 2006