Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2392050411
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heesakkers, R. A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Barentsz, J. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heesakkers, R. A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Barentsz, J. O.
(Radiology 2006;239:481-487.)
© RSNA, 2006


Genitourinary Imaging

Prostate Cancer Evaluated with Ferumoxtran-10–enhanced T2*-weighted MR Imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T: Early Experience1

Roel A. M. Heesakkers, MD, Jurgen J. Fütterer, MD, PhD, Anke M. Hövels, MSc, Harrie C. M. van den Bosch, MD, Tom W. J. Scheenen, PhD, Yvonne L. Hoogeveen, PhD and Jelle O. Barentsz, MD, PhD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (R.A.M.H., J.J.F., T.W.J.S., Y.L.H., J.O.B.) and Medical Technology Assessment (A.M.H.), University Medical Center Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein zuid 10, NL 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; and Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands (H.C.M.v.d.B.). From the 2004 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received March 11, 2005; revision requested May 3; revision received May 26; accepted June 21; final version accepted August 1. Supported by ZonMw The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development. Address correspondence to R.A.M.H. (e-mail: r.heesakkers{at}rad.umcn.nl).

Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the feasibility of ferumoxtran-10–enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at high magnetic field strength (3.0 T) and to compare image quality between 1.5- and 3.0-T MR imaging in terms of lymph node detection in patients with prostate cancer.

Materials and Methods: This study was institutional review board approved, and all patients gave written informed consent. Forty-eight consecutive patients aged 51–79 years (mean, 65.5 years) with prostate cancer were enrolled. T2*-weighted 1.5- and 3.0-T MR images of the pelvis were acquired in a sagittal plane parallel to the psoas muscle 24 hours after ferumoxtran-10 administration. A pelvic and body phased-array coil was used and yielded an in-plane resolution of 0.56 x 0.56 x 3.00 mm at 1.5 T and 0.50 x 0.50 x 2.50 mm at 3.0 T. All images were evaluated by three readers for total image quality, lymph node border delineation, muscle-fat contrast, and vessel-fat contrast. Statistical significance was calculated by using the Mann-Whitney U test. Subsequently, the general linear mixed model was used to estimate the contributions of three factors—patient, reader, and technique—to the variability of the imaging results.

Results: Significantly (P < .05) better muscle-fat contrast, vessel-fat contrast, lymph node border delineation, and total image quality were observed at 3.0-T MR imaging. The general linear mixed model revealed that the variability of all results could be attributed to the use of 3.0-T imaging.

Conclusion: Ferumoxtran-10–enhanced MR imaging can be performed at high magnetic field strengths and result in improved image quality, which may lead to improved detection of small positive lymph nodes.

© RSNA, 2006







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Radiological Society of North America.