Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print April 26, 2006, 10.1148/radiol.2393050586
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2393050586v1
239/3/703    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dewey, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kivelitz, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dewey, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kivelitz, D.
(Radiology 2006;239:703-709.)
© RSNA, 2006


Cardiac Imaging

Myocardial Viability: Assessment with Three-dimensional MR Imaging in Pigs and Patients1

Marc Dewey, MD, Michael Laule, MD, Matthias Taupitz, MD, Nicola Kaufels, DVM, Bernd Hamm, MD and Dietmar Kivelitz, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (M.D., M.T., N.K., B.H., D.K.) and Cardiology (M.L.), Charité, Medical School, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Schumannstrasse 20/21, 10117 Berlin, Germany. Received April 8, 2005; revision requested June 10; revision received July 6; accepted July 22; final version accepted August 3. Address correspondence to M.D. (e-mail: marc.dewey{at}charite.de).

Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the correlation between a three-dimensional (3D) delayed enhancement magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequence and a two-dimensional (2D) delayed enhancement MR imaging sequence for noninvasive assessment of myocardial viability in pigs and patients.

Materials and Methods: The pig and patient studies were approved by the responsible authorities, and patients gave written informed consent. MR imaging was performed by using a rapid 3D inversion-recovery balanced steady-state free precession sequence and a 2D segmented inversion-recovery fast low-angle shot sequence as the reference standard. Fourteen pigs with reperfused (n = 7) or nonreperfused (n = 7) myocardial infarction and 17 patients (13 men, four women; mean age, 64.9 years ± 8.6 [standard deviation]) suspected of having myocardial infarction were included. Linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman analysis were used to compare the infarction volumes.

Results: In 10 of the 14 pigs the induction of myocardial infarction was successful. In these pigs, altogether 81 segments with myocardial infarction were demonstrated by both MR sequences, and agreement between the two sequences for classification of transmural extent of myocardial infarction was 99.7%. The infarction volume determined by using 3D MR imaging (4.64 cm3 ± 2.48) in the pigs highly correlated with that of 2D MR imaging (4.65 cm3 ± 2.39, r = 0.989, P < .001) and that of staining by using triphenyltetrazolium chloride (4.67 cm3 ± 2.44, r = 0.996, P < .001). Thirteen of the 17 patients examined showed myocardial infarction in 34 myocardial segments with both sequences, and agreement between the two sequences for classification of transmural extent of myocardial infarction was 98.6%. In the patients, the infarction volume determined with both sequences highly correlated (9.71 cm3 ± 7.47 for the 3D sequence vs 10.01 cm3 ± 8.04 for the 2D sequence, r = 0.982, P < .001). The breath-hold time necessary for the 3D MR imaging (21.0 ± 2.3 seconds) was significantly shorter than that for 2D MR imaging (188.3 ± 20.2 seconds, P < .001).

Conclusion: Myocardial infarction volumes obtained with the 3D MR imaging sequence are highly correlated and in good agreement with volumes obtained with the 2D MR imaging standard approach and reduced the acquisition time by a factor of nine.

© RSNA, 2006




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
E. Durand, E. Mousseaux, P. Coste, R. Pilliere, O. Dubourg, L. Trinquart, G. Chatellier, A. Hagege, M. Desnos, and A. Lafont
Non-surgical septal myocardial reduction by coil embolization for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: early and 6 months follow-up
Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2008; 29(3): 348 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. W. Goldfarb, S. Arnold, and J. Han
Recent Myocardial Infarction: Assessment with Unenhanced T1-weighted MR Imaging
Radiology, October 1, 2007; 245(1): 245 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Radiological Society of North America.