HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2392050670v1 239/3/710    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lindfors, K. K. Articles by Hurlock, G. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lindfors, K. K. Articles by Hurlock, G. S.

Computer-aided Detection of Breast Cancer: A Cost-effectiveness Study¹

¹ From the Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Suite 3100, 4860 Y St, Sacramento, CA 95817. From the 2004 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received April 21, 2005; revision requested July 11; revision received June 23; final version accepted July 27. Address correspondence to K.K.L. (e-mail: kklindfors{at}ucdavis.edu).

Purpose: To analyze the cost-effectiveness of adding computer-aided detection (CAD) to a screening mammography program.

Materials and Methods: A Markov model was developed to compare three hypothetical groups of women aged 40–79 years. The first group was composed of women undergoing mammographic screening without CAD; the second, of women undergoing mammographic screening with CAD; and the third, of women undergoing observation without screening. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as the marginal cost per year of life saved (MCYLS). MCYLS was calculated for screening mammography with CAD compared with screening mammography alone and for screening mammography alone compared with observation. Sensitivity analyses were performed by varying the cost of CAD, the rates of cancer detection with CAD, and the stage distribution of breast cancers diagnosed with CAD.

Results: Adding CAD to a mammographic screening program resulted in a MCYLS of $19 058. The MCYLS of screening mammography alone compared with observation was $16 023. CAD increases the marginal effectiveness of screening by 29%; however, the marginal cost of screening is also increased by 34%. Varying the cost of CAD yields a linear increase in MCYLS from $8937 with CAD at $9 per case to $24 924 with CAD at $25 per case. The cost-effectiveness of CAD is dependent on the magnitude of the increase in cancer detection rates with CAD but is also affected by the stage distribution of cancers diagnosed with CAD.

Conclusion: The MCYLS is 19% greater for CAD added to screening versus screening mammography alone but is still within the accepted range for cost-effectiveness.

© RSNA, 2006

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. J. Gilbert, S. M. Astley, M. G.C. Gillan, O. F. Agbaje, M. G. Wallis, J. James, C. R.M. Boggis, S. W. Duffy, and the CADET II Group Single Reading with Computer-Aided Detection for Screening Mammography N. Engl. J. Med., October 16, 2008; 359(16): 1675 - 1684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]