|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Experimental Studies |
1 From the Departments of Radiology (H.J.P.) and Urology (R.A.S., L.G.F.) and the Clinical Research Program (L.A.K.), Children's Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115; Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Innsbruck, Austria (F.F.); and Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (P.L.O.). Received February 7, 2005; revision requested April 6; revision received July 20; accepted August 25; final version accepted September 12. Supported in part by National Institutes of Health grant 1 R03 EB00543-01 and by Bristol-Myers Squibb Medical Imaging grant CG#21129. Address correspondence to H.J.P. (e-mail: harriet.paltiel{at}childrens.harvard.edu).
Purpose: To quantitatively and qualitatively assess perfusion with pulse-inversion (PI) ultrasonography (US) in rabbit model of acute testicular ischemia.
Materials and Methods: Institutional animal care committee approval was obtained. After 35 rabbits underwent unilateral spermatic cord occlusion, testicular Doppler US and contrast materialenhanced PI imaging were performed. Enhancement data yielded perfusion measurements including mean value during the first 10 seconds, mean value over entire recorded replenishment curve, and curve slope during the first 5 seconds. Calculated perfusion ratios were compared with radiolabeled microspherederived perfusion ratios. Two readers assessed testicular perfusion as none, possible, or definite and relative perfusion as greater to the right testis than to the left, greater to the left testis than to the right, or as equal to both testes. With
statistics, interobserver agreement for all imaging methods was determined. Association between qualitative perfusion categories and radiolabeled microspherebased perfusion measurements was assessed. Quantitative and qualitative determinations of relative perfusion were compared with radiolabeled microspherebased measurements.
Results: Correlations between calculated and radiolabeled microspherebased perfusion ratios were determined (r = 0.490.64). Interobserver agreement for presence of perfusion was excellent (
= 0.76), and that for relative perfusion assessment was good (
= 0.55). Neither
value varied significantly with imaging method. The percentage of times a testis classified as having definite perfusion had greater perfusion as measured with radiolabeled microspheres than a testis classified as having no perfusion or possible perfusion was higher with PI imaging than with Doppler US (85%98% vs 72%89%). Identification of the testis with less perfusion was better with quantitative methods than with qualitative assessment of images by the readers (75%79% vs 34%60%, P < .004).
Conclusion: PI imaging, compared with conventional Doppler US methods, provides superior assessment of perfusion in the setting of acute testicular ischemia.
© RSNA, 2006
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |