Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print April 26, 2006, 10.1148/radiol.2393041574
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2393041574v1
239/3/901    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huegli, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Bilecen, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huegli, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Bilecen, D.
(Radiology 2006;239:901-908.)
© RSNA, 2006


Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Intraarterial MR Angiography and DSA in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: Prospective Comparison1

Rolf W. Huegli, MD, Markus Aschwanden, MD, Georg Bongartz, MD, Kurt Jaeger, MD, Hans-Georg Heidecker, MD, Christoph Thalhammer, MD, Anja-Carina Schulte, PhD, Claus Hashagen, MD, Augustinus L. Jacob, MD and Deniz Bilecen, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (R.W.H., G.B., H.G.H., C.H., A.L.J., D.B.) and Angiology (M.A., K.J., C.T.), University Hospital of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; and Biocenter, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland (A.C.S.). Received September 10, 2004; revision requested November 18; final revision received July 25, 2005; final version accepted August 11. Address correspondence to R.W.H. (e-mail: rhuegli{at}uhbs.ch).

Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the accuracy of intraarterial magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in the depiction of significant stenoses and occlusions, with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) serving as the reference standard.

Materials and Methods: Approval of the local ethics committee and informed consent were obtained. Twenty patients (11 men; nine women; age range, 48–86 years; mean age, 69.5 years ± 11.2 [standard deviation]) with symptomatic peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) were prospectively enrolled. After percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), intraarterial MR angiography was performed in the thigh and the calf with a 1.5-T MR imager in two consecutive runs. Intraarterial MR angiography was performed with a low-dose injection protocol (ie, two 20-mL injections of a 50-mmol gadolinium-based contrast agent). Moderate stenoses (luminal narrowing ≤ 50%), significant stenoses (luminal narrowing 51%–99%), and occlusions (luminal narrowing of 100%) were identified on MR angiograms, which were compared with intraarterial DSA images. Intraarterial MR angiograms were analyzed for imaging artifacts. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of intraarterial MR angiography with intraarterial DSA were determined for characterization of significant stenoses (>50%) or vessel occlusions; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for sensitivity and specificity.

Results: Intraarterial DSA revealed 78 moderate stenoses, 57 significant stenoses, and 28 occlusions. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of intraarterial MR angiography in the characterization of significant stenoses or occlusions were 92% (95% CI: 72%, 99%), 94% (95% CI: 82%, 98%), and 93%, respectively, in femoropopliteal arteries and 93% (95% CI: 83%, 98%), 71% (95% CI: 51%, 86%), and 86%, respectively, in infrapopliteal arteries. The main artifact observed with intraarterial MR angiography was venous contamination (12%).

Conclusion: Intraarterial MR angiography is an accurate method used to depict significant stenoses and occlusions in lower extremity arteries with a low-dose injection protocol.

© RSNA, 2006




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
cfpHome page
J. O'Brien, M. O. Baerlocher, M. Asch, and A. Myers
Role of radiology in geriatric care: A primer for family physicians
Can Fam Physician, January 1, 2009; 55(1): 32 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Poschenrieder, O. W. Hamer, T. Herold, T. Schleicher, I. Borisch, S. Feuerbach, and N. Zorger
Diagnostic Accuracy of Intraarterial and IV MR Angiography for the Detection of Stenoses of the Infrainguinal Arteries
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2009; 192(1): 117 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. R. Hadizadeh, J. Gieseke, S. H. Lohmaier, K. Wilhelm, J. Boschewitz, F. Verrel, H. H. Schild, and W. A. Willinek
Peripheral MR Angiography with Blood Pool Contrast Agent: Prospective Intraindividual Comparative Study of High-Spatial-Resolution Steady-State MR Angiography versus Standard-Resolution First-Pass MR Angiography and DSA
Radiology, November 1, 2008; 249(2): 701 - 711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
K. I. Paraskevas, T. T. Papas, P. Pavlidis, N. Bessias, and V. Andrikopoulos
The Importance of Conservative Measures in Peripheral Arterial Disease: An Update
Angiology, October 1, 2008; 59(5): 529 - 533.
[PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Ersoy and F. J. Rybicki
MR Angiography of the Lower Extremities
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): 1675 - 1684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]