Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2401050412
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Erratum (v242,p950a)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Memarsadeghi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Prokop, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Memarsadeghi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Prokop, M.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
(Radiology 2006;240:169-176.)
© RSNA, 2006


Musculoskeletal Imaging

Occult Scaphoid Fractures: Comparison of Multidetector CT and MR Imaging—Initial Experience1

Mazda Memarsadeghi, MD, Martin J. Breitenseher, MD, Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop, MD, Michael Weber, MS, Silke Aldrian, MD, Christian Gäbler, MD and Mathias Prokop, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (M.M., M.J.B., C.S., M.W., M.P.) and Traumatology (S.A., C.G.), Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. Received March 11, 2005; revision requested May 4; revision received May 31; accepted June 21; final version accepted August 25. Address correspondence to M.M. (e-mail: mazda.memarsadeghi{at}meduniwien.ac.at).

Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients clinically suspected of having a scaphoid fracture and who had normal initial radiographs, with radiographs obtained 6 weeks after trauma as the reference standard.

Materials and Methods: The ethics committee approved the study, and all patients gave written informed consent. Twenty-nine patients (17 male, 12 female; age range, 17–62 years; mean age, 34 years ± 13) underwent multidetector CT and MR imaging within 6 days after trauma. CT data were obtained with 0.5-mm collimation. For image review, 0.7-mm-thick multiplanar reformations were performed in transverse, coronal, and sagittal planes relative to the wrist. The 1.0-T MR examination consisted of coronal and transverse short inversion time inversion-recovery, coronal and transverse T1-weighted spin-echo, and coronal volume-rendered T2-weighted gradient-echo sequences. Two radiologists analyzed the CT and MR images. A binomial test was used to evaluate the significance of the differences between MR imaging and CT in detection of scaphoid fractures and cortical involvement (P < .05).

Results: The 6-week follow-up radiographs depicted a scaphoid fracture in 11 (38%) patients. Eight patients had a cortical fracture, while three patients had only a bandlike lucency within the trabecular portion of the scaphoid. MR imaging depicted all 11 fractures but only two cortical fractures. Multidetector CT depicted all eight cortical fractures but failed to depict trabecular fractures. No false-positive fractures were seen on MR or CT images. Differences between MR imaging and CT were not significant for the detection of scaphoid fractures (P = .25) but were significant for cortical involvement (P = .03).

Conclusion: Multidetector CT is highly accurate in depicting occult cortical scaphoid factures but appears inferior to MR imaging in depicting solely trabecular injury. MR imaging is inferior to multidetector CT in depicting cortical involvement.

© RSNA, 2006


Related Article


Radiology 2007 242: 950a. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
F. J. P. Beeres, S. J. Rhemrev, P. den Hollander, L. M. Kingma, S. A. G. Meylaerts, S. le Cessie, K. A. Bartlema, J. F. Hamming, and M. Hogervorst
Early magnetic resonance imaging compared with bone scintigraphy in suspected scaphoid fractures
J Bone Joint Surg Br, September 1, 2008; 90-B(9): 1205 - 1209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. D. Welling, J. A. Jacobson, D. A. Jamadar, S. Chong, E. M. Caoili, and P. J. L. Jebson
MDCT and Radiography of Wrist Fractures: Radiographic Sensitivity and Fracture Patterns
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 10 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
P A J McNee and J Teh
Imaging of the wrist
Imaging, September 1, 2007; 19(3): 208 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Radiological Society of North America.