Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2401051161
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cury, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Brady, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cury, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Brady, T. J.
(Radiology 2006;240:39-45.)
© RSNA, 2006


Cardiac Imaging

Diagnostic Performance of Stress Perfusion and Delayed-Enhancement MR Imaging in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease1

Ricardo C. Cury, MD, Cesar A. M. Cattani, MD, PhD, Luiz A. G. Gabure, MD, Douglas J. Racy, MD, Jose M. de Gois, MD, Uwe Siebert, MD, Sergio S. Lima, MD and Thomas J. Brady, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology and Cardiology, Beneficencia Portuguesa Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil (R.C.C., C.A.M.C., L.A.G.G., D.J.R., J.M.d.G., S.S.L.); Cardiac MRI Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (R.C.C., T.J.B.); and MGH Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (U.S.). Received July 11, 2005; revision requested August 31; revision received September 29; accepted October 18; final version accepted November 23. Address correspondence to R.C.C. (e-mail: rcury{at}partners.org).

Purpose: To prospectively determine the accuracy of a combined magnetic resonance (MR) imaging approach (stress first-pass perfusion imaging followed by delayed-enhancement imaging) for depicting clinically significant coronary artery stenosis (≥70% stenosis) in patients suspected of having or known to have coronary artery disease (CAD), with coronary angiography serving as the reference standard.

Materials and Methods: The committee on human research approved the study protocol, and all participants gave written informed consent. This study was HIPAA compliant. Forty-seven patients (38 men and nine women; mean age, 63 years ± 5.3 [standard deviation]) scheduled for coronary angiography were prospectively enrolled: 33 were suspected of having CAD (group A) and 14 had experienced a previous myocardial infarction and were suspected of having new lesions (group B). The MR imaging protocol included cine function, gadolinium-enhanced stress and rest first-pass perfusion MR imaging, and delayed-enhancement MR imaging. Myocardial ischemia was defined as a segment with perfusion deficit at stress first-pass perfusion MR imaging and no hyperenhancement at delayed-enhancement imaging. Myocardial infarction was defined as an area with hyperenhancement at delayed-enhancement imaging.

Results: One patient was excluded from analysis because of poor-quality MR images. Coronary angiography depicted significant stenosis in 30 of 46 patients (65%). In a per-vessel analysis (n = 138), stress first-pass perfusion MR imaging and delayed-enhancement imaging yielded sensitivity of 0.87, specificity of 0.89, and accuracy of 0.88, when compared with coronary angiography. The diagnostic accuracy of stress first-pass perfusion MR imaging and delayed-enhancement imaging was slightly better than that of stress and rest first-pass perfusion MR imaging in the entire population (0.88 vs 0.85), in group A (0.86 vs 0.82), and in group B (0.93 vs 0.90).

Conclusion: Stress first-pass perfusion MR imaging followed by delayed-enhancement imaging is an accurate method to depict significant coronary stenosis in patients suspected of having or known to have CAD.

© RSNA, 2006




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
V. Stangl, V. Witzel, G. Baumann, and K. Stangl
Current diagnostic concepts to detect coronary artery disease in women
Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2008; 29(6): 707 - 717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
K. R. Nandalur, B. A. Dwamena, A. F. Choudhri, M. R. Nandalur, and R. C. Carlos
Diagnostic Performance of Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 2, 2007; 50(14): 1343 - 1353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
V. Bodi, J. Sanchis, M. P. Lopez-Lereu, J. Nunez, L. Mainar, J. V. Monmeneu, O. Husser, E. Dominguez, F. J. Chorro, and A. Llacer
Prognostic Value of Dipyridamole Stress Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 18, 2007; 50(12): 1174 - 1179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. J. Gibbons, P. A. Araoz, and E. E. Williamson
The Year in Cardiac Imaging
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 4, 2007; 50(10): 988 - 1003.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. D. Karamitsos, J. B. Selvanayagam, and R. C. Cury
Are Two Tests Always Better than One?
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 319 - 320.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Radiological Society of North America.