HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) AVI movies All Versions of this Article: 2401050648v1 240/2/449    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hetzer, F. H. Articles by Weishaupt, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hetzer, F. H. Articles by Weishaupt, D.

MR Defecography in Patients with Fecal Incontinence: Imaging Findings and Their Effect on Surgical Management¹

¹ From the Division of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery (F.H.H.), Institute of Diagnostic Radiology (G.A., C.T., D.W.), and Department of Gastroenterology (U.S.), University Hospital, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland. Received April 19, 2005; revision requested June 15; revision received July 8; accepted July 20; final version accepted September 7. Address correspondence to D.W. (e-mail: dominik.weishaupt{at}dmr.usz.ch).

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate magnetic resonance (MR) defecography findings in patients with fecal incontinence who were evaluated for surgical treatment and to assess the influence of MR defecography on surgical therapy.

Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained. Informed consent was waived; however, written informed consent for imaging was obtained. Fifty patients (44 women, six men; mean age, 61 years) with fecal incontinence were placed in a sitting position and underwent MR defecography performed with an open-configuration MR system. Midsagittal T1-weighted MR images were obtained at rest, at maximal contraction of the sphincter, and at defecation. Images were prospectively and retrospectively reviewed by two independent observers for a variety of findings. Interobserver agreement was analyzed by calculating statistics. Prospective interpretation of MR defecography findings was used to influence surgical therapy, and retrospective interpretation was used for concomitant pelvic floor disorders.

Results: MR defecography revealed rectal descent of more than 6 cm (relative to the pubococcygeal line) in 47 (94%) of 50 patients. A bladder descent of more than 3 cm was present in 20 (40%) of 50 patients, and a vaginal vault descent of more than 3 cm was present in 19 (43%) of 44 women. Moreover, 17 (34%) anterior proctoceles, 16 (32%) enteroceles, and 10 (20%) rectal prolapses were noted. Interobserver agreement was good to excellent ( = 0.6–0.91) for image analysis results. MR defecography findings led to changes in the surgical approach in 22 (67%) of 33 patients who underwent surgery.

Conclusion: MR defecography may demonstrate a variety of abnormal findings in patients who are considered candidates for surgical therapy for fecal incontinence, and the findings may influence the surgical treatment that is subsequently chosen.

Supplemental material: http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/2402050648/DC1

© RSNA, 2006