|
|
||||||||
Genitourinary Imaging |
1 From the Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology (S.G.S., S.A.A., K.J.M., K.T., J.G.B.) and Renal Division, Department of Medicine (J.L.S.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115. Received February 14, 2005; revision requested April 13; revision received August 4; accepted September 1; final version accepted December 21. Address correspondence to S.G.S. (e-mail: sgsilverman{at}partners.org).
Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate whether intravenous furosemide, either alone or in addition to intravenous saline, improved depiction of the normal urinary collecting system at multidetector row computed tomographic (CT) urography.
Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval for review of patient images and medical records was obtained; informed consent was not required for this HIPAA-compliant study. Excretory phase images from multidetector row CT urography in 87 patients (44 women, 43 men; age range, 2183 years; mean, 53 years) were reviewed. Examinations were performed with, in addition to intravenous contrast medium, 250 mL of intravenous normal saline alone (n = 35), both 250 mL of normal saline and 10 mg of intravenous furosemide (n = 26), or 10 mg of furosemide alone (n = 26). Three readers, blinded to the imaging technique used, individually assigned opacification scores to each of six urinary collecting system segments. Urinary distention was assessed by one reader by measuring transverse widths of the proximal, middle, and distal ureteral segments. Mean opacification scores for each segment and mean ureteral width measurements for each technique were compared by using the Student t test.
Results: Mean opacification scores achieved with furosemide were significantly higher than those achieved with saline for the middle (P
.008) and distal (P < .001) ureteral segments. Similarly, mean ureteral widths were significantly higher with furosemide than with saline for the middle (P
.04) and distal segments (P = .01). There was no overall benefit of administering both saline and furosemide.
Conclusion: To optimize opacification and distention of the normal urinary collecting system, contrast materialenhanced multidetector row CT urography may be supplemented with intravenous furosemide alone.
© RSNA, 2006
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Kim, L. L. Wang, J. P. Heiken, C. L. Siegel, C. F. Hildebolt, and K. T. Bae Opacification of Urinary Bladder and Ureter at CT Urography: Effect of a Log-rolling Procedure and Postvoiding Residual Bladder Urine Volume Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 747 - 753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Takahashi, R. P. Hartman, T. J. Vrtiska, A. Kawashima, A. N. Primak, O. P. Dzyubak, J. N. Mandrekar, J. G. Fletcher, and C. H. McCollough Dual-Energy CT Iodine-Subtraction Virtual Unenhanced Technique to Detect Urinary Stones in an Iodine-Filled Collecting System: A Phantom Study Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1169 - 1173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |