Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2403050233
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Seifter, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Seifter, J. L.
(Radiology 2006;240:749-755.)
© RSNA, 2006


Genitourinary Imaging

Multi–Detector Row CT Urography of Normal Urinary Collecting System: Furosemide versus Saline as Adjunct to Contrast Medium1

Stuart G. Silverman, MD, Syed A. Akbar, MD, Koenraad J. Mortele, MD, Kemal Tuncali, MD, Jui G. Bhagwat, MBBS, DPH, MPH and Julian L. Seifter, MD

1 From the Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology (S.G.S., S.A.A., K.J.M., K.T., J.G.B.) and Renal Division, Department of Medicine (J.L.S.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115. Received February 14, 2005; revision requested April 13; revision received August 4; accepted September 1; final version accepted December 21. Address correspondence to S.G.S. (e-mail: sgsilverman{at}partners.org).

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate whether intravenous furosemide, either alone or in addition to intravenous saline, improved depiction of the normal urinary collecting system at multi–detector row computed tomographic (CT) urography.

Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval for review of patient images and medical records was obtained; informed consent was not required for this HIPAA-compliant study. Excretory phase images from multi–detector row CT urography in 87 patients (44 women, 43 men; age range, 21–83 years; mean, 53 years) were reviewed. Examinations were performed with, in addition to intravenous contrast medium, 250 mL of intravenous normal saline alone (n = 35), both 250 mL of normal saline and 10 mg of intravenous furosemide (n = 26), or 10 mg of furosemide alone (n = 26). Three readers, blinded to the imaging technique used, individually assigned opacification scores to each of six urinary collecting system segments. Urinary distention was assessed by one reader by measuring transverse widths of the proximal, middle, and distal ureteral segments. Mean opacification scores for each segment and mean ureteral width measurements for each technique were compared by using the Student t test.

Results: Mean opacification scores achieved with furosemide were significantly higher than those achieved with saline for the middle (P ≤ .008) and distal (P < .001) ureteral segments. Similarly, mean ureteral widths were significantly higher with furosemide than with saline for the middle (P ≤ .04) and distal segments (P = .01). There was no overall benefit of administering both saline and furosemide.

Conclusion: To optimize opacification and distention of the normal urinary collecting system, contrast material–enhanced multi–detector row CT urography may be supplemented with intravenous furosemide alone.

© RSNA, 2006




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Kim, L. L. Wang, J. P. Heiken, C. L. Siegel, C. F. Hildebolt, and K. T. Bae
Opacification of Urinary Bladder and Ureter at CT Urography: Effect of a Log-rolling Procedure and Postvoiding Residual Bladder Urine Volume
Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 747 - 753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
N. Takahashi, R. P. Hartman, T. J. Vrtiska, A. Kawashima, A. N. Primak, O. P. Dzyubak, J. N. Mandrekar, J. G. Fletcher, and C. H. McCollough
Dual-Energy CT Iodine-Subtraction Virtual Unenhanced Technique to Detect Urinary Stones in an Iodine-Filled Collecting System: A Phantom Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1169 - 1173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Radiological Society of North America.