Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print August 14, 2006, 10.1148/radiol.2411051221
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2411051221v1
241/1/156    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by von Falkenhausen, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kuhl, C. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by von Falkenhausen, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kuhl, C. K.
(Radiology 2006;241:156-166.)
© RSNA, 2006


Gastrointestinal Imaging

High-Field-Strength MR Imaging of the Liver at 3.0 T: Intraindividual Comparative Study with MR Imaging at 1.5 T

Marcus M. von Falkenhausen, MD, Götz Lutterbey, MD, Nuschin Morakkabati-Spitz, MD, Oliver Walter, PhD, Jürgen Gieseke, PhD, Renate Blömer, Winfried A. Willinek, MD, Hans H. Schild, MD and Christiane K. Kuhl, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany (M.M.v.F., G.L., N.M., J.G., R.B., W.A.W., H.H.S., C.K.K.); Leibniz Institute for Science Education, Kiel, Germany (O.W.); and Philips Medical Systems, Hamburg, Germany (J.G.). From the 2004 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received July 21, 2005; revision requested September 23; revision received October 30; accepted November 17; final version accepted January 9, 2006. Address correspondence to M.M.v.F. (e-mail: marcus.von_falkenhausen{at}ukb.uni-bonn.de).

Purpose: To prospectively evaluate whether magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the liver at 3.0 T is comparable to that at 1.5 T with respect to image artifacts, image quality, and diagnostic utility in terms of detection and characterization of focal liver lesions in patients with these lesions.

Materials and Methods: Patients provided informed consent after the study had been explained, and the institutional review board approved the study protocol. An intraindividual comparative study was performed in 21 patients (12 men and nine women; mean age, 58.7 years; range, 36–76 years) with a total of 79 focal liver lesions (benign and malignant) who were examined at 1.5- and 3.0-T MR imaging within 1 week. The imaging protocol consisted of T2-weighted turbo spin-echo (SE) sequences with or without fat suppression, as well as T1-weighted gradient-echo (GRE) sequences with or without gadolinium-based contrast agent. All images were rated independently by two radiologists with respect to types of artifacts (susceptibility, motion, pulsation, image homogeneity, and electrodynamic effects) and in regard to detectability and characterization of focal liver lesions. A modified sign test was used for statistical analysis ({alpha} < .2).

Results: Motion artifacts were significantly more pronounced in non–fat-suppressed T2-weighted turbo SE images at 3.0 T (P = .03), whereas pulsation artifacts were more pronounced (P = .19) in precontrast T1-weighted GRE 1.5-T images. No statistically significant differences (P < .2) were observed for the remaining artifacts and sequences. Of the 79 index lesions, a total of 76 were prospectively identified at 1.5-T imaging and a total of 77 were identified at 3.0-T imaging.

Conclusion: MR imaging of the liver at 3.0 T, compared with that at 1.5 T, is feasible with equivalent image quality and diagnostic utility in terms of detection and characterization of focal liver lesions.

© RSNA, 2006




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. T. Schindera, B. J. Soher, D. M. Delong, B. M. Dale, and E. M. Merkle
Effect of Echo Time Pair Selection on Quantitative Analysis for Adrenal Tumor Characterization with In-Phase and Opposed-Phase MR Imaging: Initial Experience
Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 140 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
I. C. van den Bos, S. M. Hussain, G. P. Krestin, and P. A. Wielopolski
Liver Imaging at 3.0 T: Diffusion-induced Black-Blood Echo-planar Imaging with Large Anatomic Volumetric Coverage as an Alternative for Specific Absorption Rate-intensive Echo-Train Spin-Echo Sequences: Feasibility Study
Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 264 - 271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. K. Kuhl, F. Traber, J. Gieseke, W. Drahanowsky, N. Morakkabati-Spitz, W. Willinek, M. von Falkenhausen, C. Manka, and H. H. Schild
Whole-Body High-Field-Strength (3.0-T) MR Imaging in Clinical Practice * Part II. Technical Considerations and Clinical Applications
Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 16 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. Torricelli, S. Ferraresi, F. Fiocchi, G. Ligabue, V. M. Jasonni, I. Di Monte, and F. Rivasi
3-T MRI in the Preoperative Evaluation of Depth of Myometrial Infiltration in Endometrial Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 489 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Radiological Society of North America.