Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print August 14, 2006, 10.1148/radiol.2411050860
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2411050860v1
241/1/251    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gietema, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Prokop, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gietema, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Prokop, M.
(Radiology 2006;241:251-257.)
© RSNA, 2006


Thoracic Imaging

Pulmonary Nodules Detected at Lung Cancer Screening: Interobserver Variability of Semiautomated Volume Measurements1

Hester A. Gietema, MD, Ying Wang, MD, Dongming Xu, MD, Rob J. van Klaveren, MD, PhD, Harry de Koning, PhD, Ernst Scholten, MD, Johny Verschakelen, MD, PhD, Gerhard Kohl, MSc, Matthijs Oudkerk, MD, PhD and Mathias Prokop, MD, PhD

1 From the Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands (H.A.G., M.P.); Department of Radiology, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (Y.W., D.X., M.O.); Departments of Pulmonology (R.J.v.K.) and Public Health (H.d.K.), Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany (G.K.); Department of Radiology, Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands (E.S.); and Department of Radiology, University Hospital St Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (J.V.). Received May 23, 2005; revision requested July 18; revision received September 28; accepted October 14; final version approved December 22. Address correspondence to H.A.G. (e-mail: h.gietema{at}azu.nl).

Purpose: To retrospectively determine interobserver variability of semiautomated volume measurements of pulmonary nodules and the potential reasons for variability.

Materials and Methods: The Dutch-Belgian lung cancer screening trial (NELSON) is a lung cancer screening study that includes men between the ages of 50 and 75 years who are current or former heavy smokers. The NELSON project was approved by the Dutch Ministry of Health and the ethics committee of each participating hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. For this study, the authors evaluated 1200 consecutive low-dose computed tomographic (CT) scans of the chest obtained during the NELSON project and identified subjects who had at least one 50–500-mm3 nodule. One local and one central observer independently evaluated the scans and measured the volume of any detected nodule by using semiautomated software. Noncalcified solid nodules with volumes of 15–500 mm3 were included in this study if they were fully surrounded by air (intraparenchymal) and were detected by both observers. The mean volume and the difference between both measurements were calculated for all nodules. Intermeasurement agreement was assessed with the Spearman correlation coefficient. Potential reasons for discrepancies were assessed.

Results: There were 232 men (mean age, 60 years; age range, 52–73 years) with 430 eligible nodules (mean volume, 77.8 mm3; range, 15.3–499.5 mm3). Interobserver correlation was high (r = 0.99). No difference in volume was seen for 383 nodules (89.1%). Discrepant results were obtained for 47 nodules (10.9%); in 16 cases (3.7%), the discrepancy was larger than 10%. The most frequent cause of variability was incomplete segmentation due to an irregular shape or irregular margins.

Conclusion: In a minority (approximately 11%) of small solid intraparenchymal nodules, semiautomated measurements are not completely reproducible and, thus, may cause errors in the assessment of nodule growth. For small or irregularly shaped nodules, an observer should check the segmentation shown by the program.

© RSNA, 2006




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Wang, R. J. van Klaveren, H. J. van der Zaag-Loonen, G. H. de Bock, H. A. Gietema, D. M. Xu, A. L. M. Leusveld, H. J. de Koning, E. T. Scholten, J. Verschakelen, et al.
Effect of Nodule Characteristics on Variability of Semiautomated Volume Measurements in Pulmonary Nodules Detected in a Lung Cancer Screening Program
Radiology, August 1, 2008; 248(2): 625 - 631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. A. Gietema, C. M. Schaefer-Prokop, W. P. T. M. Mali, G. Groenewegen, and M. Prokop
Pulmonary Nodules: Interscan Variability of Semiautomated Volume Measurements with Multisection CT Influence of Inspiration Level, Nodule Size, and Segmentation Performance
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 888 - 894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Radiological Society of North America.