HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2411051163v1 241/1/76    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Koos, R. Articles by Mahnken, A. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Koos, R. Articles by Mahnken, A. H. Related Collections Related Article

Prevalence and Clinical Importance of Aortic Valve Calcification Detected Incidentally on CT Scans: Comparison with Echocardiography¹

¹ From the Departments of Cardiology (R.K., H.P.K.) and Diagnostic Radiology (G.M., J.E.W., R.W.G., A.H.M.), University Hospital Aachen, University of Technology Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany. Received July 11, 2005; revision requested September 19; revision received October 10; accepted November 14; final version accepted January 2, 2006. Address correspondence to R.K. (e-mail: rkoos{at}ukaachen.de).

Purpose: To evaluate retrospectively the prevalence and grade of aortic valve calcification incidentally detected on chest multi–detector row computed tomographic (CT) scans and to compare the grade of calcification with the severity of aortic valve disease as assessed with echocardiography.

Materials and Methods: Patient informed consent was waived by the institutional board on medical ethics that approved this study. The authors identified 402 patients (231 men and 171 women; mean age, 62.5 years ± 12.1) of 1820 patients who underwent chest multi–detector row CT between July 2001 and August 2004 and also underwent echocardiography. Aortic valve calcification at multi–detector row CT was visually graded on a scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0 = no calcification, 4 = severe calcification). CT findings were correlated with hemodynamic data obtained at echocardiography. Patients without aortic stenosis were compared with patients with aortic stenosis. The Student t test, Spearman correlation coefficient, ² analysis, and an unweighted test were used to compare results.

Results: Aortic valve calcification was noted on multi–detector row CT scans in 72 of the 402 patients (18%). Twelve of 20 patients (60%) with grade 3 or grade 4 calcification on CT scans had aortic stenosis at echocardiography, compared with only nine of 382 patients (2.4%) with grade 0–2 calcification (P < .001). Significant correlations were observed between the grade of aortic valve calcification and the echocardiographically determined mean (r = 0.45, P = .03) and peak transvalvular gradient (r = 0.47, P = .03). There was substantial agreement between the grade of valve calcification at multi–detector row CT and the severity of aortic valve disease at echocardiography ( = 0.67).

Conclusion: Aortic valve calcification was an incidental finding on 18% of multi–detector row CT scans. The grade of aortic valve calcification is correlated with the hemodynamic severity of aortic valve disease as determined with echocardiography.

© RSNA, 2006

Related Article

Incidental Detection of Aortic Valve Calcification at CT

Ze-Zhou Song, Jing Ma, Ralf Koos, Harald Peter Kühl, Georg Mühlenbruch, and Andreas Horst Mahnken
Radiology 2007 245: 611-612. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. M. LaBounty, B. Sundaram, P. Agarwal, W. A. Armstrong, E. A. Kazerooni, and E. Yamada Aortic Valve Area on 64-MDCT Correlates with Transesophageal Echocardiography in Aortic Stenosis Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2008; 191(6): 1652 - 1658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z.-Z. Song, J. Ma, R. Koos, H. P. Kuhl, G. Muhlenbruch, and A. H. Mahnken Incidental Detection of Aortic Valve Calcification at CT Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 611 - 612. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Alkadhi, L. Desbiolles, L. Husmann, A. Plass, S. Leschka, H. Scheffel, R. Vachenauer, T. Schepis, O. Gaemperli, T. G. Flohr, et al. Aortic Regurgitation: Assessment with 64-Section CT Radiology, October 1, 2007; 245(1): 111 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]