Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2412050947
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chan, W. C.
Right arrow Articles by Yeh, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chan, W. C.
Right arrow Articles by Yeh, B. M.
(Radiology 2006;241:546-553.)
© RSNA, 2006


Technical Developments

Gallstone Detection at CT in Vitro: Effect of Peak Voltage Setting1

Wesley C. Chan, MD, Bonnie N. Joe, MD, PhD, Fergus V. Coakley, MD, Edwin L. Prien, Jr, MD, Robert G. Gould, PhD, Sven Prevrhal, PhD, William C. Barber, PhD, Kimberley S. Kirkwood, MD, Aliya Qayyum, MB, BS and Benjamin M. Yeh, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (W.C.C., B.M.Y., F.V.C., R.G.G., S.P., W.C.B., A.Q., B.N.J.) and Surgery (K.S.K.), University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628 and the Laboratory for Stone Research (E.L.P.), Waban, Mass. Received June 8, 2005; revision requested August 2; revision received September 29; accepted October 14; final version accepted January 9, 2006. Address correspondence to B.M.Y. (e-mail: ben.yeh{at}radiology.ucsf.edu).

This study was a retrospective single-institutional study approved by the Committee on Human Research and was HIPAA compliant. A waiver for informed consent was granted. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of four peak voltage settings on the in vitro conspicuity of gallstones in an anthropomorphic phantom at computed tomography (CT). An anthropomorphic phantom was scanned with (n = 86) or without (n = 85) gallstones at CT by using 80, 100, 120, and 140 kVp. The sensitivity for gallstone detection was significantly higher at 140 kVp (86% [74 of 86] for reader 1 and 81% [70 of 86] for reader 2) than at lower voltage settings (up to 67% [58 of 86] for reader 1 and 63% [54 of 86] for reader 2, P < .05 for each reader), regardless of gallstone size (<1.0 cm vs ≥1.0 cm in diameter, P < .05 for each reader). CT attenuation measurements were not useful for determination of gallstone composition. Abdominal CT performed at 140 kVp may be useful when gallstone disease is of clinical concern.

© RSNA, 2006




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. W. Anderson, E. Rho, and J. A. Soto
Detection of Biliary Duct Narrowing and Choledocholithiasis: Accuracy of Portal Venous Phase Multidetector CT
Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 418 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Radiological Society of North America.