|
|
||||||||
Vascular and Interventional Radiology |
1 From the Program for the Assessment of Radiological Technology (ART Program) and the Departments of Radiology (R.O., M.C.J.M.K., L.C.v.D., M.G.M.H.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (R.O., T.S., M.G.M.H.), and Vascular Surgery (M.R.H.M.v.S.), Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Dr Molewaterplein 50, Room Ee 21-40a, 3015 GE Rotterdam, the Netherlands; and the Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass (M.G.M.H.). Received May 7, 2005; revision requested July 6; revision received September 4; accepted September 22; final version accepted January 25, 2006. Supported by grants 945-01-039 from ZonMw, Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, The Hague, the Netherlands, and 904-66-091 from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, The Hague, the Netherlands. Address correspondence to M.G.M.H. (e-mail: m.hunink{at}erasmusmc.nl).
Purpose: To evaluate retrospectively the effect of vessel wall calcifications on the clinical utility of multidetector row computed tomographic (CT) angiography performed in patients with peripheral arterial disease and to identify clinical predictors for the presence of vessel wall calcifications.
Materials and Methods: The study was approved by the hospital institutional review board, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. For this study the authors included patients from two randomized controlled trials that measured the costs and effects of diagnostic imaging in patients with peripheral arterial disease. All patients underwent CT angiography and were followed up for 6 months. Clinical utility was measured on the basis of therapeutic confidence (rated on a 10-point scale) in the results of initial CT angiography and the need for additional vascular imaging. Univariable and multivariable logistic and linear regression analysis and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were used to evaluate the effect of vessel wall calcifications on the clinical utility of CT angiography and the use of patient characteristics to predict the number of calcified segments at CT angiography.
Results: A total of 145 patients were included (mean age, 64 years; 70% men). The authors found that the number of calcified segments was a significant predictor of the need for additional imaging (P = .001) and of the confidence scores (P < .001). The number of calcified segments discriminated between patients who required additional imaging after CT angiography and those who did not (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.66; 95% confidence interval: 0.54, 0.77). Age, diabetes mellitus, and cardiac disease were significant predictors of the number of calcified segments in both the univariable and multivariable analyses (P < .05).
Conclusion: Vessel wall calcifications decrease the clinical utility of CT angiography in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Diabetes mellitus, cardiac disease, and elderly age (older than 84 years) are independently predictive for the presence of vessel wall calcifications.
© RSNA, 2006
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. E. Lopera, C. K. Trimmer, S. G. Josephs, M. E. Anderson, S. Schuber, R. Li, B. Dolmatch, and B. Toursarkissian Multidetector CT Angiography of Infrainguinal Arterial Bypass RadioGraphics, March 1, 2008; 28(2): 529 - 548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W Bradbury and D. J Adam Diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease of the lower limb BMJ, June 16, 2007; 334(7606): 1229 - 1230. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |