Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2413051456
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Onclinx, C.
Right arrow Articles by Gevenois, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Onclinx, C.
Right arrow Articles by Gevenois, P. A.
(Radiology 2006;241:763-770.)
© RSNA, 2006


Experimental Studies

Elastase-induced Pulmonary Emphysema in Rats: Comparison of Computed Density and Microscopic Morphometry1

Cécile Onclinx, DVM, Viviane De Maertelaer, PhD, Pascal Gustin, DVM, PhD and Pierre Alain Gevenois, MD, PhD

1 From the Department for Functional Sciences, Section of Pharmacology, Pharmacotherapy, and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liege, Belgium (C.O., P.G.); Statistical Unit, Institute of Interdisciplinary Research in Human and Molecular Biology, University of Brussels, Belgium (V.D.M.); and Department of Radiology, Erasme Hospital, University of Brussels, Route de Lennik 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium (P.A.G.). Received August 30, 2005; revision requested November 2; revision received December 13; accepted January 3, 2006; final version accepted February 8. Supported by the Walloon Region (grants 021/5112 and 021/5354). Address correspondence to P.A.G. (e-mail: pierre.alain.gevenois{at}ulb.ac.be).

Purpose: To prospectively compare computed tomographic (CT) quantification of pulmonary emphysema in elastase-treated rats with morphometry and to evaluate the information yielded by CT quantification and pulmonary function tests.

Materials and Methods: This study was approved by the local committee on care and use of animals in research. Thirty-six animals were used. Emphysema was produced by means of one or two tracheal injections of 300 IU of elastase, 8 weeks apart, in seven and 12 rats, respectively. As a control group, 10 rats received an injection of normal saline. The dynamic resistance, dynamic compliance, and static compliance were measured. CT was performed with 1-mm section thickness and 3-mm intervals. Relative areas of lung with attenuation coefficients lower than nine chosen thresholds (from –900 to –980 HU) and eight percentiles (from 1st to 18th percentiles) of the distribution of attenuation coefficients were compared with measurements of alveoli size—that is, mean interwall distance (MIWD) and mean perimeter per field (MP). Correlations between data obtained with thresholds and percentiles and MIWD and MP were investigated by means of Spearman coefficients (rs). Values of pulmonary function tests, most appropriate relative area threshold, and percentile were investigated by means of stepwise multiple regressions.

Results: For thresholds, relative surface area with attenuation coefficients less than –940 HU (RA940) showed the strongest correlations with findings at microscopy (rs = 0.676, P < .001 for MIWD; rs = –0.720, P < .001 for MP). For percentiles, the 3rd percentile showed the strongest correlations (rs = –0.647, P < .001 for MIWD; rs = 0.701, P < .001 for MP). Dynamic compliance and RA940 or 3rd percentile were complementary for predicting microscopic measurements.

Conclusion: In rats, RA940 and the 3rd percentile reflect the extent of elastase-induced pulmonary emphysema and are complementary to dynamic compliance to predict microscopic extent.

© RSNA, 2006







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Radiological Society of North America.