Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print October 10, 2006, 10.1148/radiol.2413042056
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2413042056v1
241/3/880    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eibel, R.
Right arrow Articles by Schoenberg, S. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eibel, R.
Right arrow Articles by Schoenberg, S. O.
(Radiology 2006;241:880-891.)
© RSNA, 2006


Thoracic Imaging

Pulmonary Abnormalities in Immunocompromised Patients: Comparative Detection with Parallel Acquisition MR Imaging and Thin-Section Helical CT1

Roger Eibel, MD, Peter Herzog, MD, Olaf Dietrich, PhD, Christina T. Rieger, MD, Helmut Ostermann, MD, Maximilian F. Reiser, MD and Stefan O. Schoenberg, MD

1 From the Department of Clinical Radiology, University of Munich, Ziemssenstrasse 1, 80336 Munich, Germany (R.E., P.H., O.D., M.F.R., S.O.S.); and Department of Haematology/Oncology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany (C.T.R., H.O.). Received December 5, 2004; revision requested February 2, 2005; revision received November 15; accepted January 2, 2006; final version accepted February 6. Address correspondence to R.E. (e-mail: Roger.Eibel{at}t-online.de).

Purpose: To compare parallel acquisition magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with thin-section helical computed tomography (CT) for depiction of pulmonary abnormalities suggestive of pneumonia in immunocompromised patients.

Materials and Methods: The institutional review board approved this study; prior consent was obtained. Thirty consecutive neutropenic patients (10 women, 20 men; mean age, 51 years ± 15 [standard deviation]; range, 25–75 years) with fever of unknown origin or clinical signs and symptoms of lung infection were examined with breath-hold single-shot half-Fourier turbo spin-echo MR imaging. To reduce image blurring and increase MR signal in the lungs, the echo time was shortened with generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition (GRAPPA). Patients underwent thoracic CT (four detector rows and 1-mm section thickness [4 x 1 mm]; pitch, 6) as reference standard. Pulmonary abnormalities (ill-defined nodules, ground-glass opacity areas, and consolidation), their location and distribution, and lesion characteristics were analyzed at MR imaging by three readers, blinded to results of CT, in consensus. Frequencies were calculated for each feature; paired Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to examine whether differences between CT and MR imaging features were statistically significant ({alpha} < .05). Bonferroni adjustments were performed. Overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were determined.

Results: Twenty-two patients had pulmonary abnormalities at CT. In 21 (95%) patients, pneumonia was correctly diagnosed with MR imaging. One false-negative finding occurred in a patient with ill-defined nodules smaller than 1 cm at CT. One false-positive finding with MR imaging was the result of blurring and respiratory artifacts (sensitivity, 95%; specificity, 88%; positive predictive value, 95%; negative predictive value, 88%). There was no significant difference in lesion location and distribution.

Conclusion: With parallel imaging (GRAPPA technique) and fast MR imaging, detection of pulmonary abnormalities is almost as good as with CT. MR imaging has a slight disadvantage in its lower capability to assist in characterization of specific internal features, such as cavitations.

© RSNA, 2006




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
R. Kumar, S. Basu, D. Torigian, V. Anand, H. Zhuang, and A. Alavi
Role of Modern Imaging Techniques for Diagnosis of Infection in the Era of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2008; 21(1): 209 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
T. A. Altes, M. Eichinger, and M. Puderbach
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Lung in Cystic Fibrosis
Proceedings of the ATS, August 1, 2007; 4(4): 321 - 327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Radiological Society of North America.