HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2413051571v1 241/3/908    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Macari, M. Articles by Babb, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Macari, M. Articles by Babb, J.

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Can the Arterial Phase at CT Evaluation after Endovascular Repair Be Eliminated to Reduce Radiation Dose?¹

¹ From the Departments of Radiology (M.M., H.C., J.L., J.B.) and Vascular Surgery (P.L.), New York University School of Medicine, Suite HW 211, 560 First Ave, New York, NY 10016; and Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, Pa (B.S.). Received September 20, 2005; revision requested November 18; revision received December 20; accepted January 20, 2006; final version accepted March 1. Address correspondence to M.M. (e-mail: michael.macari{at}med.nyu.edu).

Purpose: To retrospectively determine if arterial phase computed tomographic (CT) imaging is necessary for follow-up imaging of patients who have undergone endovascular stent-graft therapy for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Materials and Methods: This HIPAA-compliant study was exempt from institutional review board approval; informed patient consent was waived. Eighty-five patients (66 men, 19 women; mean age, 66 years; range, 45–81 years) underwent 110 multidetector CT examinations after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Nonenhanced CT images were obtained. Intravenous contrast material was then injected at 4 mL/sec, and arterial and venous phase (60 seconds) CT images were obtained. The nonenhanced and venous phase images were evaluated to determine if an endoleak was present. Subsequently, arterial phase images were analyzed. The effective dose was calculated. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals as indicators of how often arterial phase imaging would contribute to the diagnosis of endoleak were determined.

Results: Twenty-eight type II endoleaks were detected by using combined nonenhanced and venous phase acquisitions. Twenty-five of the 28 endoleaks were also visualized during the arterial phase. Three type II endoleaks were seen only during the venous phase. The arterial phase images depicted no additional endoleaks. Seventy-eight CT examinations performed in 67 patients revealed no endoleak during the venous phase. The arterial phase images also depicted no endoleaks at these examinations. Thus, for no more than 3.1% of all examinations, there was 95% confidence that arterial phase imaging would depict an endoleak missed at venous phase imaging. Arterial phase imaging contributed to a mean of 36.5% of the effective dose delivered.

Conclusion: Study results indicate that arterial phase imaging may not be necessary for the routine detection of endoleaks. Radiation exposure can be decreased by eliminating this phase.

© RSNA, 2006

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. W. Stavropoulos and S. R. Charagundla Imaging Techniques for Detection and Management of Endoleaks after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 641 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]