Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print September 27, 2006, 10.1148/radiol.2412051020

(Radiology 2006;241:589.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2412051020v1
241/2/589    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Dennie, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Dennie, C. J.
© RSNA, 2006

Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Pleural Mesothelioma: Sensitivity and Incidence of Needle Track Seeding after Image-guided Biopsy versus Surgical Biopsy1

Prachi P. Agarwal, MD2, Jean M. Seely, MD, Fred R. Matzinger, MD, Robert M. MacRae, MD, Rebecca A. Peterson, MD, Donna E. Maziak, MD and Carole J. Dennie, MD

1 From the Departments of Diagnostic Imaging (P.P.A., J.M.S., F.R.M., R.A.P., C.J.D.), Radiation Oncology (R.M.M.), and Thoracic Surgery (D.E.M.), Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1Y 4E9. Received June 17, 2005; revision requested August 18; revision received September 26; accepted October 12; final version accepted January 2, 2006. Address correspondence to J.M.S. (e-mail: jeseely{at}ottawahospital.on.ca).

Purpose: To retrospectively compare the sensitivity of image-guided core-needle biopsy, thoracoscopy, and thoracotomy in the diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma and to retrospectively determine the incidence of needle track seeding after these procedures.

Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained, and informed consent was not required. The study included 100 consecutive patients (81 men, 19 women; average age, 65.8 years) with pathologically proved malignant pleural mesothelioma who were treated between 1994 and 2002. A total of 23 core-needle biopsies were performed in 22 patients, and 11 of these biopsies were coupled with fine-needle aspiration biopsy. A coaxial technique was used, and biopsy was performed with fluoroscopic (12 biopsies), computed tomographic (10 biopsies), or ultrasonographic (one biopsy) guidance. Sixty-nine patients underwent surgical biopsy in the form of thoracoscopy (n = 51) and/or thoracotomy (n = 21). Patients were followed up clinically for any evidence of needle track seeding after image-guided or surgical procedures. The sensitivity of diagnostic procedures and the incidence of needle track seeding as a result of intervention were calculated.

Results: Sensitivity was 86% for image-guided core-needle biopsy, 94% for thoracoscopy, and 100% for thoracotomy. The incidence of needle track seeding was 4% for image-guided core-needle biopsy and 22% for surgical biopsy.

Conclusion: Image-guided core-needle biopsy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma has a lower incidence of needle track seeding than surgical biopsy and has a high sensitivity for diagnosis.

© RSNA, 2006







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Radiological Society of North America.