Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print November 7, 2006, 10.1148/radiol.2421051006
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2421051006v1
242/1/162    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burns, P. N.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burns, P. N.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, S. R.
(Radiology 2007;242:162-174.)
© RSNA, 2006


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Focal Liver Masses: Enhancement Patterns on Contrast-enhanced Images—Concordance of US Scans with CT Scans and MR Images1

Peter N. Burns, PhD and Stephanie R. Wilson, MD

1 From the Departments of Medical Biophysics (P.N.B.) and Medical Imaging (P.N.B., S.R.W.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Imaging Research, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave, S660, Toronto, ON, Canada M4N 3M5 (P.N.B.); and Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.R.W.). Received June 15, 2005; revision requested August 18; revision received November 2; accepted December 8; final version accepted April 7, 2006. Supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Terry Fox Programme of the National Cancer Institute of Canada and in part by Bristol-Myers Squibb Medical Imaging. Address correspondence to P.N.B. (e-mail: Burns{at}swri.ca).

Purpose: To assess prospectively the concordance of enhancement patterns of focal liver masses on contrast material–enhanced ultrasonographic (US) scans with patterns on contrast-enhanced computed tomographic (CT) scans or magnetic resonance (MR) images.

Materials and Methods: This study was approved by the institutional review board; patients gave informed consent. Contrast-enhanced US and contrast-enhanced CT or MR imaging were performed in 135 patients (62 men, 73 women; mean age, 51 years) with 144 confirmed liver masses. Masses included 49 hepatocellular carcinomas, 13 metastases, 30 hemangiomas, 41 lesions of focal nodular hyperplasia, and 11 others. Randomized image sets from each modality were shown independently to three blinded readers, who answered identical questions about enhancement of the lesion and liver in the arterial and portal venous phases and changes with time. Concordance for modalities was calculated from answers of readers and consensus answers between readers, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The {kappa} values were calculated for interreader agreement.

Results: Features of arterial phase enhancement showed concordance of more than 76% for modalities. The highest concordance of 92% (132 of 144), with 95% CI of 86% and 95% ({kappa} > 0.84), was for the presence of peripheral pools and centripetal progression. Concordance in the portal venous phase was lower, with agreement for predominant enhancement of the lesion in 61% (86 of 142), with 95% CI of 52% and 68% ({kappa} > 0.83). Portal venous phase washout occurred in 75% (106 of 142), with 95% CI of 67% and 81% ({kappa} > 0.81). The majority of discordances were for malignancies for which only US depicted no sustained enhancement in the portal venous phase.

Conclusion: US shows high concordance with CT or MR imaging, especially for the arterial phase. Discordance in the portal venous phase may reflect the tendency of CT and MR contrast agents, unlike microbubbles, to diffuse into interstitium.

© RSNA, 2006




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
T. Takayama, M. Makuuchi, M. Kojiro, G. Y. Lauwers, R. B. Adams, S. R. Wilson, H.-J. Jang, C. Charnsangavej, and B. Taouli
Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Pathology, Imaging, and Therapy
Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2008; 15(4): 972 - 978.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
L. Greenbaum, P. Burns, J. Copel, D. Cosgrove, J. B. Fowlkes, B. Goldberg, R. Mattrey, D. Merton, M. Robbin, and S. Wilson
American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine Recommendations for Contrast-Enhanced Liver Ultrasound Imaging Clinical Trials
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2007; 26(6): 705 - 716.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Radiological Society of North America.