HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wyler, A. Articles by Laredo, J.-D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wyler, A. Articles by Laredo, J.-D.

Hyaline Cartilage Thickness in Radiographically Normal Cadaveric Hips: Comparison of Spiral CT Arthrographic and Macroscopic Measurements¹

¹ From the Departments of Skeletal Radiology (A.W., V.B., J.D.L.) and Pathology (M.P.), Lariboisière Teaching Hospital, 2 rue Ambroise Paré, 75475 Paris Cedex 10, France; Paris VII University UFR Lariboisière-Saint Louis, Paris, France (C.B.); Centre Médico-chirurgical, Paris V University, Paris, France (E.L.); and Department of Statistics, Fernand-Widal Teaching Hospital, Paris, France (E.V.). Received August 18, 2005; revision requested October 27; revision received January 26, 2006; accepted February 14; final version accepted May 1. Address correspondence to A.W. (e-mail: annabelle.wyler{at}lrb.aphp.fr).

Purpose: To assess spiral multidetector computed tomographic (CT) arthrography for the depiction of cartilage thickness in hips without cartilage loss, with evaluation of anatomic slices as the reference standard.

Materials and Methods: Permission to perform imaging studies in cadaveric specimens of individuals who had willed their bodies to science was obtained from the institutional review board. Two independent observers measured the femoral and acetabular hyaline cartilage thickness of 12 radiographically normal cadaveric hips (from six women and five men; age range at death, 52–98 years; mean, 76.5 years) on spiral multidetector CT arthrographic reformations and on coronal anatomic slices. Regions of cartilage loss at gross or histologic examination were excluded. CT arthrographic and anatomic measurements in the coronal plane were compared by using Bland-Altman representation and a paired t test. Differences between mean cartilage thicknesses at the points of measurement were tested by means of analysis of variance. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibilities were determined.

Results: At CT arthrography, mean cartilage thickness ranged from 0.32 to 2.53 mm on the femoral head and from 0.95 to 3.13 mm on the acetabulum. Observers underestimated cartilage thickness in the coronal plane by 0.30 mm ± 0.52 (mean ± standard error) at CT arthrography (P < .001) compared with the anatomic reference standard. Ninety-five percent of the differences between CT arthrography and anatomic values ranged from –1.34 to 0.74 mm. The difference between mean cartilage thicknesses at the different measurement points was significant for coronal spiral multidetector CT arthrography and anatomic measurement of the femoral head and acetabulum and for sagittal and transverse CT arthrography of the femoral head (P < .001). Changes in cartilage thickness from the periphery to the center of the joint ("gradients") were found by means of spiral multidetector CT arthrography and anatomic measurement.

Conclusion: Spiral multidetector CT arthrography depicts cartilage thickness gradients in radiographically normal cadaveric hips.

© RSNA, 2007